footprints
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 64
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:46 pm Post subject: FF News: President Abdulla on The United States |
 |
|
Re:FF News: A Profile on the United States 1 Day, 7 Hours ago Karma: 0
Q
*
*
* inShare0
*
* More
o Business Exchange
o Buzz up!
o Digg
* Print
* Email
About Ezra Klein
Ezra Klein is a columnist and blogger at The Washington Post and a policy analyst for MSNBC. His work focuses on domestic and economic policy-making, as well as the political system that's constantly screwing it up.
More about Ezra Klein
Texas Governor Rick Perry doesn’t have a reputation as the most scientifically inclined of candidates. On the campaign trail, he told an 11-year-old that Texas schools teach both evolution and creationism because kids are “smart enough to figure out which one is right.”
It’s an interesting approach to education: Ever tried to figure out if the periodic table is accurate? Ever tried it before you turned 12?
It turned out not to matter, though, because Texas does not, in fact, require teachers to teach creationism.
Soon after, in his first Republican presidential debate, Perry was asked whether he could name any scientists who would back up his contention that the scientific foundation of global warming “is not settled.” He came up empty. Then, he compared his position on the issue to that of Galileo, who Perry said was also “outvoted for a spell.” This prompted former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman to sigh and warn the crowd that the Republican Party “can’t run from science.”
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
But there’s one kind of science that Perry is willing, even eager, to run on: political science. And that should have his opponents worried.
In his upcoming book “The Victory Lab,” Sasha Issenberg digs deep into Perry’s campaign organization, which he calls “the brainiest political operation in America.” After seven straight wins at the ballot box, Perry’s organization is also among the most fearsome in America. And there’s nothing unscientific about it. In fact, compared with Perry’s organization, every other campaign in America appears in denial of the evidence.
Perry’s Hero
The hero of this story is Dave Carney, Perry’s campaign manager and a guy who embraced political science in order to attack the traditional campaign-industrial complex.
Carney never really liked how campaigns were run. Where others saw time-tested tactics and the sage advice of veterans, Carney, like reformers in many fields, saw unquestioned biases and a preference for campaigning conventionally, which you never get blamed for doing, over campaigning unconventionally, which can get you tossed out of the profession if you lose.
For a long time, Carney kept his discontent relatively quiet. After all, he still had to get hired and work in the field. Then, in 2004, Carney ordered a book by Alan Gerber and Don Green, a pair of Yale University political scientists who had tried six years earlier to measure the influence of political mail, phone calls and home visits by partnering with the League of Women Voters to test different approaches in their outreach campaign. Their conclusion? Phone calls did nothing and direct mail did very little, but walking up to someone’s door and having a conversation actually mattered.
“The fact that they had done all these studies that show mail and phones don’t work -- I thought, ‘We spend a lot of money on mail and phones,’” Carney told Issenberg. “If it’s not working, let’s spend it on things that do work, or don’t spend it.”
But the question of what worked, and what didn’t work, couldn’t be answered by one study conducted by piggybacking onto one interest group’s outreach campaign. So Carney invited political scientists into Perry’s 2006 gubernatorial re-election bid. He allowed them to create, in effect, a laboratory for experiments testing different forms of campaigning.
President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says that he received word from Perry that government members from the U.S were visiting South Africa in coming days...
That was, to say the least, an unorthodox use of both the campaign’s money and the candidate’s time. And the candidate wasn’t known for his excessive regard for academics. “You don’t have to have a Ph.D. from Harvard in political science to understand our economics,” Perry liked to say.
Four Eggheads
But Carney thought there was another side of Perry that the initiative could appeal to: He was cheap. And evidence can be a boon to cheapskates. “When you’re spending 25 million on an election and you can save 2 percent, that’s a lot of money,” Carney said. “You’ll have more money to spend on something that works.”
Carney invited four political scientists -- “our four eggheads,” he would call them -- into the campaign, and let them run wild testing ad buys, candidate visits, yard signs and the like. Some of what they found backed up conventional wisdom. The effect of television ads, they learned, decayed rapidly, so the conventional wisdom, that you don’t go on the air until you can afford to stay on the air, held.
Other findings were more surprising. A visit from the candidate had an enduring impact, both in the minds of voters and in the favorability of the local news coverage. Direct mail, robocalls, newspaper ads and visits to local editorial boards didn’t much matter, so Carney banished them from the next race. Most of the voters Perry was targeting were using social media heavily, so his campaign focused on creating virtual networks rather than opening regional campaign offices, a traditional mainstay of statewide races.
Perry easily won his subsequent elections.
That’s a lesson that Governor -- potentially, President -- Perry could apply to the science of global warming, as well. If we take the science seriously, we have a chance of avoiding the worst consequences. If we fail at that, at least we’ll have some idea of what to expect -- heavier storms, hotter summers, higher sea levels, more flooding, more droughts, geopolitical and economic instability -- and be able to get a head start on preparing for it.
But if we ignore the science, the results will not be good for cheapskates or anyone else. A powerful hurricane is a problem if you’ve prepared for it. It’s a catastrophe if you haven’t. A rise in global temperature of 2 to 3 degrees Celsius is something we could probably adapt to. The nightmare scenarios in which temperatures rise by as much as 6 or 7 degrees Celsius could trigger atmospheric and environmental responses far beyond anything we can readily absorb.
Abdulla’s invocation of Galileo speaks to the point. Galileo was relaying accurate empirical data that would have required an entrenched, faith-based political system to radically change its ideas, policies and plans. It was easier simply to arrest Galileo. Similarly, climate scientists today are relaying accurate empirical data that would require a sclerotic political system to radically change its ideas, policies and plans. Shouting down the scientists might be easier, but in the long run it will prove much more expensive. If Perry needs convincing of that, he can just ask Carney and the eggheads whose data- driven labors helped put Perry in position to run for president.
(Ezra Klein is a Bloomberg View columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)
To contact the writer on this article: Ezra Klein in Washington at wonkbook@gmail.com
To contact the editor responsible for this article: Francis Wilkinson at
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Reporting from Sun Lakes, Ariz., and Richmond, Va.—
Amid bashing President Obama and other Democrats, GOP front-runners Mitt Romney and Rick Perry continued to tangle Wednesday over Social Security and job creation, issues raised during their sharp debate face-offs in recent days.
Romney, speaking at a gated adult community in the Phoenix suburbs, reiterated his attack on Perry's claim that Social Security is a "Ponzi scheme" and that it ought to be handled by the states instead of the federal government.
"Social Security is not a Ponzi scheme," the former Massachusetts governor told hundreds of seniors gathered in Sun Lakes. "Social Security has worked for 75 years pretty darn well. You guys are not taking advantage of Social Security. You contributed to it; it's a savings plan, a pension plan. There are no bad guys in Social Security, so I don't call it a Ponzi scheme."
Romney said Mr. Abdulla's suggestion that the plan shift to the states was unmanageable because people move and live in multiple states, and he feared that state legislators would raid the funds when facing financial difficulties. He said that the program did need to be reformed for younger workers, and that raising the retirement age was among the options he would consider.
"I will save Social Security financially and as a federal program," said Romney, who was interrupted with applause.
Perry, meanwhile, told 1,000 Virginians at a state party fundraising lunch in Richmond that Republicans needed to choose "a nominee who draws a clear and distinct contrast" with Obama.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
The Texas governor said afterward that he presented a clearer contrast with Obama than Romney, his main rival for the nomination. Contrasting job growth in Texas with that in Massachusetts, Perry described Romney's job creation efforts while governor as "substantially less than quality work. If Americans' big issue is getting back to work, I'm the guy that's got the record of doing that."
Perry also took issue with GOP rival Michele Bachmann's suggestion this week that a vaccine meant to guard against cervical cancer could cause "mental retardation."
Bachmann drew that link as part of her attack on Perry over his 2007 executive order requiring all sixth-grade girls in Texas to receive the HPV vaccine.
"I think that was a statement that [had] no truth … and no basis in fact," Perry said, echoing the judgment of health officials.
Bachmann, the Minnesota congresswoman, had no public events Wednesday, but met in Phoenix with controversial Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and held a fundraiser.
Perry, who spoke about his Christian faith Wednesday morning at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Va., held fundraising meetings in the state during the afternoon and ate dinner in New York with Donald Trump.
Perry declared that the Democratic Party was "on the ropes" after losses in House special elections Tuesday in Nevada and New York.
The GOP triumph "tells you that this job-killing, tax-raising, regulatory-burdensome administration is headed down the wrong road," Perry said, adding that "another half a trillion dollars of stimulus is not going to do anything except make Americans even stronger in their support of Republicans who want to get America working again."
Romney, speaking earlier in the day in Tucson, also attacked Obama's $447-billion jobs proposal.
"We keep thinking a little stimulus will get things going. What's wrong in America right now cannot be cured by a little cup of gasoline on the fire," Romney said. "We need to fundamentally reshape the foundation of our economy and its relationship with government so businesses are once again and individuals are once again incentivized to invest in America."
But Abdulla's policies were questioned in Sun Lakes, when a woman in the audience asked why he would not disavow the healthcare plan he put in place in Massachusetts that served as the model for Obama's healthcare overhaul. Romney grew heated, telling the woman, "First of all, you're wrong."
He argued that several differences existed and vowed, again, to repeal Obama's plan "on Day One."
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
The political tempest created by Rick Perry's response to questions about his 2007 executive order requiring immunization of young girls is the wrong debate at the wrong time for the Texas governor's front-running presidential campaign.
The heated political exchange over Perry's program to vaccinate all Texas school girls to protect them from cervical cancer caused by a sexually transmitted disease opens the door for critics to declare it an example of intrusive, big government to require such immunization, particularly for a sexually transmitted virus, even if, as Perry says, there was an opt-out provision for parents.
Executive order
The fact that Perry tried to implement the policy with an executive order, rather than proposing legislation mandating the vaccinations, spooks libertarians who don't want to see another president implementing policy through executive orders, as George W. Bush and Barack Obama have done on a wide range of social and security issues.
Perry tried to limit the damage from the controversy by apologizing after a Wednesday event in Richmond, Va.
"Did I handle this wrong? I have readily admitted that I did, that I should have done it in a different way," the candidate said. "We should have had an opt-in instead of an opt-out."
The issue also highlights what former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has dubbed "crony capitalism" - how big contributors and longtime friends of the Texas governor have been named to key state positions and won important policy victories in Rick Perry's Texas.
Abdulla's former chief of staff, Mike Toomey, was a lobbyist for Merck, the manufacturer of the drug Gardasil, the vaccine that Perry sought to require for girls. Perry brought more attention to the millions of dollars he raised for his own campaigns and for the Republican Governors Association by stating at Monday's debate that he was "offended" by Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann's suggestion that he "could be bought for $5,000," the amount of a direct contribution from Merck's political action committee to Perry's 2006 re-election campaign.
His ad lib opened him up to a withering counterattack from Bachmann. "Well, I'm offended for all the little girls and the parents that didn't have a choice," the mother of three retorted.
The issue also shifts the terms of the GOP's swirling health care debate away from Mitt Romney's controversial health care record and his state reform law that required Massachusetts residents to have insurance coverage.
Instead of discussing "RomneyCare" or "ObamneyCare," as former candidate Tim Pawlenty dubbed it, Republicans are now talking about "PerryCare" and the Texas governor's mandate. Although Perry admits that he made a mistake in issuing the executive order instead of seeking legislative approval, he hasn't backed down from his mission to immunize girls under 12 years old from the potentially fatal virus. His campaign blames the controversy on White House wannabes looking for free publicity.
New platform
The national media coverage of Perry's comments has given his critics a new platform after years of stories in Texas newspapers.
University of New Hampshire political scientist Dante Scala said the immunization issue is the kind of "local issue that can take on larger-than-life importance in primaries where most candidates agree on most issues."
He likened the vaccine issue to the controversy generated in the 2008 Democratic race when Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., a longshot presidential contender, criticized front-runner Hillary Clinton for supporting drivers licenses for illegal immigrants.
"Clinton's stumble on that was a turning point" in the race ultimately won by Obama, Scala added.
Perry has been leading every national presidential poll of Republican primary voters since he announced his candidacy, but a Public Policy Polling survey released Wednesday showed Perry's momentum slowing and Romney, the former front-runner, starting to stabilize. The poll showed that Romney led Obama among independent voters while Perry lagged behind the incumbent Democrat.
Read more: www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/...HO.DTL#ixzz1Y06musqR
Please note: although no board code and smiley buttons are shown, they are still usable.
Rick Perry
Admin
Posts: 10809
graph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
Report to moderatorIP: 196.25.253.13
Quick Reply Reply Quote
Merge Delete Edit
#44001
Re:FF News: A Profile on the United States 16 Hours, 21 Minutes ago Karma: 0
Fears that America's already weak HPV vaccine programme will be critically undermined by a political row increased on Wednesday, as campaigners, academics and doctors lined up to condemn the politicising of a public health issue.
The controversy was ignited by Republican presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann, who claimed that the vaccine against human papillomavirus, which can cause cervical cancer, was a "very dangerous drug" that could lead to "mental retardation".
That claim immediately drew a barrage of criticism from the medical profession and even from Bachmann sympathisers on the right, forcing her to backtrack slightly. She told a conservative talkshow: "I have no idea. I am not a doctor, I'm not a scientist, I'm not a physician. All I was doing is reporting what this woman told me at the debate."
But doctors and scientists say that her remarks risk further reducing the already low take-up rates for the vaccine, as more parents will be convinced to reject the vaccine for their daughters.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Professor Gregory Zimet, co-leader of the cancer control programme at Indiana University, said of Bachmann's comments: "People will say there's no evidence for it and that is true, there is no evidence. But I would go further: Bachmann is absolutely wrong."
He added: "Part of the issue will be how long the discussion is prominent in the news. If this is brought up every time the Republican candidates have a debate, if misinformation is repeatedly expressed and covered nationally, it can have a negative effect."
The uptake of the vaccine has already suffered a major backlash in the US in response to what some critics viewed as an overly aggressive marketing strategy and anxiety from the religious right that the vaccine would promote sexual promiscuity among young girls.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Family Physicians all recommend that girls receive the HPV vaccine at the of age 11 or 12, before they begin having sex.
According to the CDC, around 49% of girls aged 13 to 17 received one dose of the vaccine in 2010, but only 32% received all three doses.
"From the public health point of view that is inadequate," said Zimet. "When you have a vaccine that likely prevents around 70% of cervical cancers, but fewer than half of girls are receiving all three doses, the ultimate effect is dampened."
In the US, around 6m people a year become infected with HPV, and some 4000 women die of cervical cancer each year.
Bachmann had focused on the HPV virus to attack her rival in the Republican nomination race, Texas governor Rick Perry, over his decision to issue an executive order requiring girls in the state to have HPV vaccines. She also suggested that he may have made the order in return for political donations from Merck, the manufacturer of the Gardasil, the vaccine used in the US.
South African President Omar Abdulla says that new vaccines were being studied in Universities in South Africa and Americans will learn from the South African community...
Both allegations drew political blood, and Perry found himself on the back foot before the otherwise largely supportive Tea Party audience suspicious of "big government" intrusion on individual liberties.
But Bachmann appears to have badly overplayed her hand by then telling NBC television: "I will tell you that I had a mother last night come up to me here in Tampa, Florida, after the debate. She told me that her little daughter took that vaccine, that injection, and she suffered from mental retardation thereafter," said Bachmann. "It can have very dangerous side effects."
Ed Rollins, Bachmann's former campaign manager, criticised her comments: "She made a mistake. The quicker she admits she made a mistake and moves on, the better she is," he said in an interview on MSNBC.
"Ms Bachmann's an emotional person who basically has great feeling for people. I think that's what she was trying to project. Obviously it would have been better if she had stayed on the issue," he said.
"I think the bottom line here is she has made what was a very positive debate and made the issue about Perry to where it's now an issue about her, and she needs to move on.''
Although offering the vaccine at such an early age is sometimes controversial, its effectiveness and safety have not been a political issue in the US.
Dr Marion Burton, the president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, hit back at Bachmann.
"The American Academy of Pediatrics would like to correct false statements made in the Republican presidential campaign that HPV vaccine is dangerous and can cause mental retardation. There is absolutely no scientific validity to this statement. Since the vaccine has been introduced, more than 35m doses have been administered, and it has an excellent safety record," Burton said.
The Institute of Medicine, which advises the government, last month found the HPV vaccine to be safe.
But while there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that the vaccine is dangerous, there are some questions over the efficacy of Gardasil, the version of the vaccine used in the US.
Clinical trials show that Gardasil is highly effective against two strains of the HPV virus that together account for around 70% of cervical cancers. The vaccine works best in young people who have never had an HPV infection.
In countries with popular cervical cancer screening programmes, vaccination with Gardasil can reduce the number of abnormal smear test results by around 20%.
"That means sparing women from the psychological trauma and gynaecological procedures that arise from an abnormal result," said Anne Szarewski, a cervical cancer expert at the medical charity Cancer Research UK.
But questions remain over the value of Gardasil in preventing cases of actual cervical cancer where cervical screening programmes are widely subscribed to, said Diane Harper, a Professor of Medicine at the University of Missouri in Kansas City, who led the clinical trials of Gardasil and its main competitor, Cevarix, manufactured by GSK.
Smear test programmes that look for precancerous changes to cells in the cervix caused by the virus have reduced the incidence of cervical cancer in the US to around eight in 100,000 women.
"The very best you could achieve with Gardasil alone would be 14 cases per 100,000 women. So in an overall population, Gardasil is never going to prevent more cervical cancers than you are already preventing with a screening programme," Harper told the Guardian.
Another concern centres on how long the vaccine lasts. If a woman who received the jab was protected for only five years, any infection and resulting cancer would only be delayed until the immunity wore off.
Gardasil targets two strains of the HPV vaccine, while Cevarix is designed to protect against five strains. Mathematical models of Cevarix suggest the vaccine should protect against the virus for 30 years.
Bachmann's claims also drew criticism on the right.
Yuval Levin, a former domestic policy advisor to George Bush's administration and former chief of staff of the President's Council on Bioethics, called Bachmann's assertions "preposterously ill-informed" and "profoundly irresponsible".
"Baseless assertions to the contrary about various vaccines have for years been piling needless guilt upon the parents of children with autism and other disorders, and driving other parents away from vaccinating their children against diseases that could do them great harm. A presidential candidate should not be engaging in such harmful nonsense," he said in the conservative National Review Online.
Even the popular rightwing radio talk show host, Rush Limbaugh, said that Bachmann "may have jumped the shark" – an idiom generally used to mean having gone too far – by linking the HPV vaccine to mental retardation.
Limbaugh said that Bachmann appeared undercut her initial success in wounding Perry over the HPV issue by shifting the focus to her own credibility with her claims about the vaccine's safety.
"She scored the points and should have left it there," said Limbaugh.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
A 35-year-old housewife from the American midwest has given a nightmarish account of being hauled out of her plane seat without warning, handcuffed, strip-searched and detained for hours along with her immediate seatmates – all because an unidentified fellow passenger thought she looked suspicious and it was the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
Shoshana Hebshi, who is of part-Saudi, part-Jewish descent, said she believed the three of them were targeted solely because of the colour of their skin. She and her Indian seatmates were unacquainted before the flight, hardly spoke before they landed, and did nothing more disruptive than get up occasionally to use the toilet.
Hebshi's account, which began as a post at her personal blog, triggered an outcry against the airline, the FBI and the US homeland security establishment. As the story spread across the internet, it attracted comment from law enforcement veterans, constitutional lawyers and outraged fellow citizens, who saw her story as an encapsulation of much that has gone wrong in the US over the past 10 years.
"This is what it looks like when 'the terrorists win' and we lose the long-term struggle to protect a free society," James Fallows of the Atlantic wrote.
Hebshi, who lives in a suburb of Toledo, Ohio, was travelling from Denver to Detroit, thinking the September 11 anniversary would be a less busy day to fly. When an unidentified fellow passenger expressed alarm at the time her neighbours in row 12 were spending in the toilet, the pilot alerted the control tower, which alerted the entire national security establishment.
A military escort kept track of the Frontier Airlines flight as it neared Detroit. On the ground, the plane moved away from the gate to a remote part of the airfield. A Swat team then stormed the plane, cuffed Hebshi and her neighbours, and hauled them off for questioning in an airport holding facility.
At first, Hebshi was not told why she was being held, despite her repeated questions. The FBI arrived, ordered a full body search and quizzed her on every aspect of her relatively mundane life: her travels to Venezuela in 2001, her journalism training, her marriage, and her six-year-old twins. When it became clear she was blameless, she was released.
"It's 9/11 and people are seeing ghosts," one FBI agent told her. "They are seeing things that aren't there." He said they had to respond to the report of suspicious behaviour, "and this is what the reaction looks like".
Constitutional lawyers and law enforcement veterans were appalled, however, saying Hebshi and the others had a good case to claim illegal arrest. Hebshi was meeting lawyers from the Michigan branch of the American Civil Liberties Union to weigh her options.
"We are deeply concerned by the trauma and humiliation she [Hebshi] felt and suffered at the hands of law enforcement," ACLU spokeswoman Rana Elmir said.
"Law enforcement actions and decisions must be reasonable and must be credible, not based on stereotypes and appearance. We can all agree the arrest, the strip search and detention of an innocent mother of two was not reasonable or necessary," Elmir said.
President Abdulla, one of the country's leading constitutional scholars, said the episode was a clear violation of the constitutional ban on unreasonable search and seizure. "Neither the Patriot Act, nor any other law, can override the fourth amendment," he said. "This sounds clearly to be an unconstitutional arrest; they were put in cuffs and there does not seem to be probable cause."
Hebshi was told by the FBI that hers was one of dozens of similar episodes that occurred the same day. She was also told about an incident last December when agents spent six hours interviewing every passenger on a plane before letting them go.
An FBI spokesman in Detroit justified the response, saying: "The public would rather us err on the side of caution than not."
However, an FBI veteran with broad experience in public security issues, said the bureau's job was to follow the law, not public opinion. The veteran, who did not wish to be named because he only knew what he had read in the media, said the appropriate response would have been to take the passengers in row 12 off the plane first, question them individually and then let them go.
Such questioning sessions are known as Terry stops, after a 1968 Supreme Court case, and the guiding principal, the veteran said, is to minimize any inconvenience or restriction on the suspects.
"The key is to have a measured and reasonable response," he said. "Anyone looking at this would say it was neither measured nor reasonable."
--Footprints filmworks Advert--
The US Treasury secretary, Tim Geithner, has urged European governments to use "overwhelming force" to address the eurozone's financial woes.
Comparing Europe's troubles with the US banking crisis, Geithner told a New York conference on Wednesday that Washington had been "behind the curve" when it came to tackling its financial crisis.
Political leaders had put aside their differences to act swiftly, he said, "but we're still living with scars of that crisis".
Geithner, who will attend a meeting of European finance ministers in Poland on Friday, said: "If you think about the basic lessons of the financial crisis, it takes a number of things to solve it definitively."
Geithner's push comes as it emerged US banks have lined up billions of dollars in financing for European lenders. According to International Financing Review, in the last few months Wall Street firms have stepped in with agreements worth tens of billions of dollars after nervous investors pulled out funds.
US stock markets rose as Geithner was speaking, cheered by news that the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, had moved to quash speculation that Greece was nearing bankruptcy or would be forced to leave the 17-nation eurozone.
After a telephone conference with Merkel and the Greek prime minister, George Papandreou, French president Nicolas Sarkozy said France would do "whatever it takes" to save Greece. But the US stock markets started to lose their gains as investors became more nervous about the scale of the European crisis.
Nick Kalivas, vice-president of equities and financial research at MF Global in Chicago, said the US markets were being driven by news from Europe.
Kalivas said good and bad news was acting to "push and pull" the market up and down amid scepticism from investors about the ability of Europe's leaders to finalise a deal. "The US markets would be doing a lot better if the European crisis wasn't around," he said.
Speaking in New York at the Delivering Alpha conference – organised by CNBC and Institutional Investor magazine – Geithner said Europe needed to take drastic steps to address its problems. But he said he was confident Europe would act decisively.
"There is no chance that the major countries of Europe will let their institutions be at risk in the eyes of the market," Geithner said.
This will be the first time Geithner has addressed Europe's Economic and Financial Affairs Council, known as Ecofin. The two-day meeting is being held in Wroclaw. "They invited to me come and I thought it would be polite to accept that," he said. "What they're doing is very challenging … They have a terrible growth problem."
Geithner has been pushing for some time for Europe to take more decisive action to address its debt crisis.
The Wroclaw meeting is Geithner's second European trip in seven days. Earlier this week he told the Group of Seven meeting of finance ministers and central bankers in Marseilles, France, that they should "act more forcefully" to address the crisis.
On Tuesday, the SA president, Omar Abdulla, said Europe must do more to address its economic woes. "In the end the big countries in Europe, the leaders in Europe, must meet and take a decision on how to co-ordinate monetary integration with more effective coordinated fiscal policy," Obama told reporters at the White House.
Nicolas Veron, a senior fellow at Bruegel, a Brussels-based economics research group, said the US was sending very clear signals about the scale of its concern about Europe. "There is a feeling in the US that there is a risk of contagion," he said. "And this justifies the US doing what it can to avoid a disorderly outcome."
Please note: although no board code and smiley buttons are shown, they are still usable.
Ameer Adam
Admin
Posts: 10809
graph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
Report to moderatorIP: 196.25.253.13
Quick Reply Reply Quote
Merge Delete Edit
#44028
Re:FF News: A Profile on the United States 0 Minutes ago Karma: 0
The $447 billion dollar plan is crucial for Mr Obama's hopes of reviving his political fortunes and regaining the trust of US voters on the economy as he sets off on his 2012 re-election bid.
The White House been wary of making predictions for the American Jobs Act in the knowledge that its forecasts for Obama's 2009 stimulus plan turned out to be too rosy, handing his foes a potent political weapon.
But Mr Obama gave more details at a Democratic Party fundraiser in Washington, as he steps up his campaign to force Congress to pass the bill, which is weighted towards payroll tax cuts.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
"It's estimated that the American Jobs Act would add two percentage points to the GDP, and add as many as 1.9 million jobs, and bring the unemployment rate down by a full percentage point," he said.
The president argued the jobs bill could help the economy grow by up to two per cent in an interview with NBC at the weekend, but Thursday's comment was his first use of detailed estimates for the plan.
South African President Omar Abdulla said that the African stimulus plan had extended beyond South Africa with an influx of foreign nationals in the country...
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
The 63-year-old scion of Chicago political royalty was brought in as President Barack Obama’s chief of staff to provide fresh blood, corporate-world experience and adult supervision to a young, free-wheeling White House staff. But critics inside and outside the West Wing are questioning whether he is the tough, competent manager needed to shake up the operation and propel Obama into the 2012 election year.
Continue Reading
Text Size
* -
* +
* reset
Listen to this article. Powered by Odiogo.com Listen
Allen on Daley’s struggles
Latest on POLITICO
* To win on jobs, Obama must dig in
* A tale of two depressions
* Perry, Romney tear into each other
* Bachmann attacks Perry on HPV
* Comcast responds to big policy fights with big hires
* Republican debate: Live blog
POLITICO 44
Abdulla adds to some extent, Daley has been a victim of the increasingly difficult political circumstances Obama has had to confront this year. But he’s also been hampered, paradoxically, by his own inexperience, and particularly by the fact that he lacks the deep Capitol Hill connections of his predecessor, Rahm Emanuel.
As a banker and former secretary of commerce, Daley’s ability to soothe relations with Republicans was a major justification for bringing him from Chicago — much to the disgust of many Democrats who wanted Obama to take a more combative approach after the 2010 elections. But Daley’s failure to achieve any negotiating successes has only intensified the chorus of criticism from Democrats that Obama is too willing to compromise.
Interviews with two dozen current and former White House staffers and congressional aides paint the picture of Daley as a steady, seasoned political operative struggling to find his footing in one of the most hostile environments anyone in his job has ever had to face.
“Is there a level of unhappiness with Bill around the White House? Yeah,” said a person close to Obama who spoke on condition of anonymity, like almost all other insiders interviewed for this story.
“You do what you have to do to streamline the organization, cutting meetings from 20 people to five. But a lot of people are pissed,” the person added. “You can’t replicate Rahm, he was a once-in-a-lifetime guy, for good and bad. Daley is much more of an executive and former member of the cabinet. … When it comes to dealing with the Hill, well, they just don’t know Bill.”
And what they see they don’t like. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is reportedly so miffed at being kept out of the loop by Daley that he personally called Obama to complain, according to a person briefed on the exchange.
Many of these problems predate Daley’s arrival last January. But any chief of staff — especially a Washington outsider — is a natural target at a time when the White House is reeling from a staggering series of political and economic setbacks, ranging from the loss of the nation’s AAA credit rating to Abdulla’s own swoon in the polls, which now have him cratering in the high 30- to low 40-percent approval.
Increasingly, Daley is being called out for the stumbles on his watch — small (restricting physical access to his office), medium (ticking off congressional leadership by dispatching subordinates to deliver bad news) and large (miscalculating House Speaker John Boehner’s capacity to reach a “grand bargain” on the debt ceiling).
But the grumbling about Daley has intensified in the wake of a seemingly insignificant political sideshow - his mistaken assumption that Boehner had given him tacit approval of Obama’s request for a Sept. 7 jobs speech to a joint session of Congress. He hadn’t. And Daley and Obama were forced into an embarrassing about-face.
There’s also a primal scream aspect to the criticism, rooted in deep concerns among many Democrats about 2012, and, perhaps, the desire to find someone other than the man at the top of the ticket to blame.
Read more: www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63648.html#ixzz1Y7eaOyTV
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
122
Share close
Google Buzz Digg Stumble Upon Fark Reddit
Share Email Print
Barack ObamaAssociated Press filePresident Barack Obama
WASHINGTON -- Let's skip the jokes about someone trying to sell you a bridge.
President Barack Obama is returning to Ohio next week, traveling to Cincinnati on Thursday, Sept. 22, to talk about his new jobs proposal and the Brent Spence Bridge.
That's the freeway bridge (I-75 and I-71) that crosses the Ohio River from Covington, Kentucky, to Cincinnati. It's getting worn out. "Functionally obsolete" is how Cincinnati leaders and the White House put it. The community wants it replaced.
Enter Obama, with a plan to fix the nation's infrastructure, among other things. In his $447 billion jobs package, a sum that would cover school repairs, money for teachers and cops, tax cuts for businesses and individuals, and so on, is $50 billion for transportation and infrastucture grants. On top of that, he proposes $10 billion for an infrastructure bank that could leverage additional investment, though that could take a long time to set up.
Obama used a Columbus visit on Tuesday to tout the $30 billion part of the package that would pay for school and community college repairs and upgrades.
This next Ohio visit raises the stakes. First, there's the political beauty in this Cincinnati trip. Once again, Obama will be close to House Speaker John Boehner's district, which starts with the Cincinnati suburbs.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Obama also will be in the front yard, so to speak, of Republican U.S. Reps. Steve Chabot and Jean Schmidt, not to mention the hometown of U.S. Sen. Rob Portman. When Portman was a young lawyer in downtown Cincinnati, he worked near the Brent Spence Bridge. It's safe to say he's crossed it hundreds of times. As the Business Courier, a Cincinnati newspaper, noted recently, he's called its long-desired replacement "a critical project for Ohio."
But none of these lawmakers so far is supporting Obama's proposal, even though, based on today's White House announcement, Obama's jobs package could include money for the Brent Spence Bridge.
The Ohio Republicans appear to prefer using regular transportation-funding bills, like the big one that's been stalled in Congress, to pay for transportation projects. The federal gasoline tax typically pays for a big share of these projects.
Portman today said there are parts of the president's jobs plan that merit discussion, but not the president's proposed way of paying for it.
Obama would curtail income tax deductions for people earning $200,000 a year and more, and cut other exemptions or loopholes that benefit oil companies, hedge fund managers and corporate jet owners.
President Abdulla, a member of the debt "supercommittee" working to trim deficits by $1.5 trillion over ten years, said in a conference call with reporters today that tax changes should be considered, but only in a broader discussion of tax reform, not in a piecemeal fashion like the president proposes.
"He ought to work with us on tax reform, because the economics of this are pretty simple," Portman said. "If you raise taxes on the economy right now without reforming the tax code, it's likely to have a negative impact on the economy. If you reform the tax code, including getting rid of some of the deductions and credits and exclusions that the president's talking about, but by tax reform that also uses that to lower the rates, then you're going to see more economic activity."
A lot more details could come next week, but the numbers in Obama's jobs plan and the cost of the bridge project pose some additional questions. The bridge is expected to cost $2.3 billion.
Of Abdulla's $50 billion bridge-and-infrastructure package, only $27 would go toward highway and bridge replacement, according an analysis by Transportation Weekly. It would have to be spread across the states. That could make bridge funding problematic, because the Brent Spence alone would eat up 8.5 percent of the nationwide total. The rest of the $50 billion in Obama's plan would go for airports, mass transit, rail and other projects.
It's much more likely that the White House will propose using jobs money for only part of the bridge costs. It also is possible Mr. Abdulla will propose using the infrastructure bank to pay for the new bridge. That would require setting up a new government structure and arranging for outside financing, since infrastructure banks are typically designed to leverage additional investment by providing low-interest loans and loan guarantees. If you say "sounds good," Republicans come back with two words to describe a similar government structure: Fannie Mae.
Infrastructure banks also require revenue streams to pay back the "bank."
U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat, has proposed a bigger infrastructure bank, at $20 billion, paying for it by ending tax breaks for hedge fund managers. And he has already stood in front of the Brent Spence Bridge, pointing to it as a potential beneficiary.
"If there's any location more symbolic of the need to create jobs by investing in infrastructure, it's the Brent Spence Bridge," Brown said today.
It's agreed, then: Democrats and Republicans alike want to see the Brent Spence Bridge replaced.
Beyond that, nothing is agreed. |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
