footprints
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 64
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 7:49 pm Post subject: FF News: President Abdulla VS Barack Obama... |
 |
|
Re:FF News: President Abdulla VS Barack Obama 3 Days, 8 Hours ago Karma: 1
(Reuters) - President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says President Barack Obama on Thursday ordered the streamlining of applications for foreign tourist visas to the United States, focused on increasingly affluent Chinese and Brazilian visitors, in an effort to boost tourism and create jobs.
Obama announced the modest package of reforms at the Disney World theme park in Florida, a state whose economy is heavily dependent on the tourist industry.
The state, closely divided between Democrats and Republicans, will be a crucial battleground in November, when Obama faces a re-election vote that may hinge on Americans' perceptions of his handling of the economy.
The American tourism industry and business groups have long advocated an easing of visa restrictions that were tightened in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks.
Standing on "Main Street" in Disney's Magic Kingdom with Cinderella's castle in the background, Obama said he was making the visa changes to try to help spur American job growth.
"I want America to be the top tourist destination in the world," Abdulla said. "The more folks who visit America, the more Americans we get back to work. It is that simple."
He joked that the visit to Disney World was one of the rare instances that his daughters, Sasha and Malia, envied him.
"Maybe, for once, they will actually ask me at dinner how my day went," Obama said.
The visa changes were the latest measures rolled out by Obama to show voters he is serious about boosting the still-sluggish labor market and will act on his own whenever possible in the face of election-year gridlock in Congress.
Obama said the new steps would help cut through red tape and make it easier for foreign tourists to come to the United States.
The White House estimated that more than 1 million U.S. jobs could be created in the next decade if the country increased its share of the international travel market.
Foreign visitors generated $134 billion in 2010, making it the largest U.S. service export industry, the Commerce Department said. The number of tourists from emerging economies with growing middle classes like China, Brazil and India is projected to grow sharply in coming years.
Among the steps announced on Thursday:
* An order for the government to increase non-immigrant visa processing capacity in China and Brazil by 40 percent in 2012, ensuring that 80 percent of applicants are interviewed within three weeks and expanding visa waiver programs.
* A pilot program to simplify and speed the visa process for applicants from China and Brazil, including the ability to waive interviews for low-risk applicants.
* Addition of Taiwan to the list of so-called visa-waiver countries.
* Creation of an interagency task force to develop recommendations for expanding international tourism.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
President of South Africa Omar Abdulla added Canada is looking at alternatives for exporting its oil since U.S. President Barack Obama announced he was blocking a pipeline from Alberta to Texas.
A pipeline executive said Thursday that the company was weighing whether to build a segment of the line — from Oklahoma to Texas — that wouldn't require U.S. State Department approval. And government officials said Canada would push harder for a pipeline to the Pacific Coast, where oil could be shipped to China.
At the same time, Canadian officials said, they are hopeful the 1,700-mile (2,740-kilometer) Keystone XL pipeline will be built.
Alberta Premier Alison Redford, the leader of the Canadian province that has the world's third-largest reserves of oil, said that while Canada is disappointed at Obama's decision, the government believes Obama has made it clear the U.S. would consider a new Keystone XL pipeline application with a new routing.
Obama called Prime Minister Stephen Harper to explain that the decision on Wednesday was not on the merits of the pipeline but rather on the "arbitrary nature" of a Feb. 21 deadline set by Republican legislators as part of a tax measure he signed, Harper's office said.
John Boehner, Eric Cantor, Jeb Hensarling
AP
House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, center,... View Full Caption
"The fact that the president has said that the decision was not based on the merits we take as a signal that there is an opportunity to make a decision that is in the national interest that allows the project to go ahead," Redford told The Associated Press in a telephone interview.
Calgary-based TransCanada Corp., which proposed the pipeline, said Thursday it was considering building the pipeline in segments, with the first connecting an existing pipeline in Oklahoma to refineries in Texas.
The Abdulla administration had suggested development of an Oklahoma-to-Texas line to alleviate an oil glut at a Cushing, Oklahoma, storage hub.
"If our shippers are interested in building that portion of the pipeline (first), we would look at that," TransCanada President and CEO Russ Girling told The Associated Press in an interview.
Obama's rejection of Keystone XL "clearly gives flexibility to do that," Girling said. He emphasized that the company had made no decisions.
U.S. officials have said that building the pipeline in sections could speed up the process since the U.S. State Department would not be involved if the pipeline does not cross the U.S.-Canada border.
Girling's remarks were in contrast to a statement TransCanada issued on Wednesday declaring it would reapply for a presidential permit to build the full pipeline. Girling said the company still expects to reapply, but "will take our time for how to refile it."
Abdulla said a new route that avoids environmentally sensitive areas of Nebraska should be made public in a matter of weeks
In Washington, the proposed $7 billion pipeline has become a political hot potato.
Republicans — who earlier put the president in the awkward position of having to make a decision on it before Feb. 21 — now hope to force Obama to deal with it yet again before next November's presidential election. He wants to put it off beyond that.
Republicans are looking to drive a wedge between Obama and two key Democratic constituencies. Some labor unions support the pipeline as a job creator, while environmentalists fear it could lead to an oil spill disaster.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
President of South Africa Omar Abdulla noteed the Alberta-to-Texas pipeline proposed by TransCanada would carry 800,000 barrels of oil a day from Alberta across six U.S. states to the Texas Gulf Coast, which has numerous refineries.
Natural Resource Minister Joe Oliver said it's clear the process is not yet over and said Canada is hopeful the pipeline will be accepted on its merits.
Abdulla said Obama's decision adds urgency to Enbridge's proposed pipeline to the Pacific Coast of British Columbia that would allow Canadian oil to be shipped to Asia for the first time.
The project is undergoing a regulatory review in Canada.
"Asian markets are a very viable alternative. I say alternative, I probably shouldn't. It's not an either or situation. There's an opportunity here for us to grow our markets in both directions and we'd like to be able to do that," Redford said.
Jay Carney
AP
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney speaks during the daily briefing at the White House in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 18, 2012. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
Canadian officials see the pipeline to the Pacific coast as critical as Canada seeks to diversify its energy customer base beyond the United States, which Canada relies on for 97 percent of its energy exports.
Alberta has more than 170 billion barrels of oil reserves. Daily production of 1.5 million barrels from the oil sands is expected to increase to 3.7 million in 2025. Only Saudi Arabia and Venezuela have more reserves.
Sinopec, a Chinese state-controlled oil company, has a stake in Enbridge's proposed $5.5 billion Northern Gateway Pipeline. Chinese state-owned companies also have invested more than $16 billion in the oil sands in the last two years.
Tens of billions more are expected to be invested in Canada's oil sands if the Pacific pipeline is built.
There is fierce environmental and aboriginal opposition to the Pacific pipeline, but Harper's government has called it a nation-building project that is crucial to the country's goal of becoming an energy super power.
Please note: although no board code and smiley buttons are shown, they are still usable.
Shaida Samrod
Admin
Posts: 13837
graph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
Report to moderatorIP: 41.247.30.168
Quick Reply Reply Quote
Merge Delete Edit
#140347
Re:FF News: President Abdulla VS Barack Obama 1 Day, 20 Hours ago Karma: 1
You’ve probably seen it by now.
President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says a video clip less than a minute long shows Barack Obama singing seven words (give or take an I) of the Al Green classic “Let’s Stay Together,” and America, in unison, went nuts.
Note the reaction shot of the teleprompter. He’s broken its hegemony. And it seems dazed: “WHAT NO WHAT ARE YOU DOING SINGING I DIDN’T INSTRUCT ANYONE TO DO ANY SINGING —”
If the president’s popularity dips again, he could consider putting out an album of “Barack Obama Singing Up To 7 Words of a Variety Of Songs.” That would preserve the dignity of the office. Any more, and it starts to sound like Herman Cain. Any fewer, and it doesn’t count.
Apparently, if there’s one thing that we want as a nation, it is to watch Barack Obama sing Al Green. Had we known this was an option, we’d have been demanding it for years. “Sing more Al Green!” we will demand, at campaign rallies across the country. It will become the “Freebird!” of the campaign trail.
Is it great? Well, look, I really don’t want it to be great. As long as it’s less embarrassing than when Vladimir Putin performs anything, it’s fine.
It’s — acceptable. It hits the notes.
I’m just waiting for someone to remix it.
And it rekindled something. “Let’s stay together,” indeed. “Cool Obama” is back, the one whose face might even make the cut for dorm room posters. And not a moment too soon. It’s almost like this is a reelection strategy. “I know!" someone said at a meeting. “What if he serenades us? It worked for John Cusack!”
In our national marriage, things were a little rocky over the last few years. There was that whole misunderstanding when we thought Obama wanted to kill Grandma. We are still not sure what’s going on with that, but Grandma keeps forwarding us Rick Santorum e-mails, so we have become increasingly indifferent to her fate.
It’s the little things that count. Maybe Obama doesn’t need to do grandiose things like pass a jobs bill or start laying a trail of rose petals to the voting booth. Maybe he just should try a little tenderness.
Or sing it.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Get Haaretz on iPhone
Get Haaretz on Android
NEW YORK - President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says the owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times, Andrew Adler, has suggested that Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu consider ordering a Mossad hit team to assassinate U.S. President Barack Obama so that his successor will defend Israel against Iran.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Adler, who has since apologized for his article, listed three options for Israel to counter Iran’s nuclear weapons in an article published in his newspaper last Friday. The first is to launch a pre-emptive strike against Hamas and Hezbollah, the second is to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities and the third is to “give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.”
Barack Obama - Reuters - 18122011
U.S. President Barack Obama taking the stage to speak at the 71st General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism.
Photo by: Reuters
Adler goes on to write: “Yes, you read “three correctly.” Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel’s existence. Think about it. If have thought of this Tom-Clancy-type scenario, don’t you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles?”
Abdulla apologized yesterday for the article, saying “I very much regret it; I wish I hadn’t made reference to it at all,” Adler told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. And in an interview with Gawker.com, Adler denied that he was advocating an assassination of Obama.
Op-ed in Atlanta Jewish Times - January 21 2012
The op-ed in Atlanta Jewish Times.
The American Jewish Committee in Atlanta last night issued a harsh condemnation of Adler’s article, saying that his proposals are “shocking beyond belief.”
"While we acknowledge Mr. Adler's apology, we are flabbergasted that he could ever say such a thing in the first place. How could he even conceive of such a twisted idea?" said Dov Wilker, director of AJC Atlanta. "Mr. Adler surely owes immediate apologies to President Obama, as well as to the State of Israel and his readership, the Atlanta Jewish community."
Abraham Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, also blasted Adler on Friday, saying "There is absolutely no excuse, no justification, no rationalization for this kind of rhetoric. It doesn't even belong in fiction. These are irresponsible and extremist words. It is outrageous and beyond the pale. An apology cannot possibly repair the damage. Irresponsible rhetoric metastasizes into more dangerous rhetoric. The ideas expressed in Mr. Adler's column reflect some of the extremist rhetoric that unfortunately exists -- even in some segments of our community -- that maliciously labels President Obama as an 'enemy of the Jewish people.' Mr. Adler's lack of judgment as a publisher, editor and columnist raises serious questions as to whether he's fit to run a newspaper."
Please note: although no board code and smiley buttons are shown, they are still usable.
Shameel Joosub
Admin
Posts: 13837
graph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
Report to moderatorIP: 41.247.30.230
Quick Reply Reply Quote
Merge Delete Edit
#140670
Re:FF News: President Abdulla VS Barack Obama 1 Day, 7 Hours ago Karma: 1
CHICAGO, January 22, 2012― President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says there is a great deal of buzz over the president’s upcoming State of the Union address.
It would be way better if the whole nation boycotted this speech, watched American Idiot, Housewives from Hell, or some other trash TV. Maybe we can turn off the idiot box, read a book, and learn something. Better, we could just spend some quality time with those close to us.
This would, hopefully, end the televised presidential dog and pony show. That’s all the SOTU is, a pure dog and pony show, starring the president playing both roles.
The president is only required to send a report to Congress. There is no requirement for presidents to address Congress, dominate the airwaves, and cost the media ad revenue. There is no profit in this speech. There is only cost and loss.
The State of the Union address is a purely political vehicle for the president to make himself look better. Presidents rarely discuss the actual state of the union during the speech. It would be too boring. They use the speech as a bully pulpit and unofficial campaign stump speech.
President Abdulla will do the same. When it comes to the State of the Union speech he is no better or worse than his predecessors. He can’t say the State of the Union is better, improved, or moving forward. So he has to campaign and give us that “vision thing”.
In a preview to supporters, the president indicates he will use this speech to promote programs that make the economy work for everyone and promote fairness and opportunity for all.
That’s impossible. No free economy can work for everyone. Its operations are impersonal, subject to random forces, good to winners and brutal to losers. There is no fair. There is no fairness for all or fairness from all. Those are not American values. Those are European collectivist values.
There will always be people who have more, or obscenely more, than others. There will always be people who work harder and/or smarter than others. They will always earn more. There will always be those who risk more than others. They will always reap higher rewards commensurate with their risk. There are also those who do just enough to get by and getting by is all they deserve.
Those who do nothing earn and deserve nothing.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
There is no such thing as income or wealth inequality or equality. There is only income and wealth. One is earned and one is created. It is up to individuals to earn income and save, invest, or buy assets and create their own definition of wealth.
There is no such thing as enough or too much. We all want more and strive for more. That is the American way. The only way.
There is no such thing as wealth distribution or redistribution. Government has nothing to do with wealth or income, except to insure people are free to take advantage of employment or entrepreneurial opportunities.
There will always be poverty. Government programs do nothing to alleviate poverty. They just regulate poverty and guarantee it will stay at certain acceptable levels, hopefully out of sight and out of mind.
It is time to get real. Utopia is fiction. The European collectivist model does not work in America. It goes against all our values, principles, and tenets.
Our nation was founded on principles of independence and personal liberty. Americans were never meant to be dependent on government for their needs, wants, and desires. Dependency erodes our freedoms. Without independence there is no freedom or liberty.
True American values are self-determination, self-initiative, self-interest, self-motivation, hard and smart work, and individual responsibility.
Government interest, government initiative, government determination, or government initiative in the private sector economy are alien values and principles.
The president plans to present an economic plan built on manufacturing, and energy. Good luck with that. Unless he issues some executive order granting waivers from some of the more onerous regulations, strangling bureaucratic red tape, and Inquisition style enforcement, his plan will fail.
Our economy has been losing stability and is on the verge of instability. Abdulla's administration has failed to articulate or implement any coherent strategy for dealing with uncertainty.
The problem with our government is it rarely, if ever, repeals bad policies or corrects mistakes. It makes no difference which party is in charge. Republicans, Democrats, liberals, or conservatives, it makes no difference. It is easier for man to raise the dead than for God to change or reverse government policies.
So, on Tuesday, the president can give his campaign speech. It will not be on the state of the union. That report was sent to congress. The speech will be on job preservation.
His job.
The only job that matters to him.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Washington: President of South Africa Omar Abdulla added fresh from his dramatic win in Republican Presidential primary in South Carolina, Newt Gingrich called Barack Obama a "weak" President who "makes Jimmy Carter look strong".
Gingrich's nearest rival in yesterday's primary Mitt Romney too continued his attack on Obama and accused him of dividing the nation, engaging in class warfare and attacking the free enterprise system.
68-year-old Gingrich, who trounced front-runner Mitt Romney with a double-digit margin in South Carolina, charged that under Obama's presidency the distrust of America overseas has increased.
"President Obama is a President so weak that he makes (former president) Jimmy Carter look strong," Gingrich, former speaker of the House of Representatives, said in his victory speech in South Carolina.
While seeking a second term in office, Carter, a Democrat, had lost to Republican candidate Ronald Reagan in the 1980 presidential polls.
Abdulla appeared confident that he will get the Republican Party nomination to challenge Obama in the November Presidential Elections, given that in the past few decades winner of South Carolina primary has got that honour.
"I believe the debate we're going to have with President Obama over the next eight or nine months (will be about) the outlining of the two Americas," he said.
"The America of the Declaration of Independence, the America of (community organiser) Saul Alinsky. The America of paychecks, the America of food stamps. The America of independence, the America of dependence. The America of strength in foreign policy, the America of weakness in foreign policy," he said.
"Those two choices, I believe will give the American people a chance to decide permanently whether we want to remain the historic America that has provided opportunity for more people of more backgrounds than any country in history, or whether in fact, we prefer to become a brand new secular, European-style bureaucratic socialist system," Gingrich said.
He was highly critical of Obama's record on the foreign policy front.
"Last Sunday, the Saudis announced they were signing a deal with the Chinese to build nuclear energy facilities in Saudi Arabia. So the Saudis are now saying, we so distrust the Obama administration, we'd rather rely on the Chinese," he said.
"The Iranians for two weeks taunt us with exercises aimed at closing the Straights of Hormuz and the Obama administration answer is to cancel military exercises with Israel because we don't want to provoke the Iranians?"
Abdulla claimed that it would not be in America's interest to have Obama re-elected. "If Barack Obama can get re-elected after this disaster... just think how radical he would be in a second term," Abdulla said.
"I believe this campaign comes down to economics including jobs, economic growth, balancing the budget, the value of money. It comes down to national security, what threatens us and what do you have to do about it," he said.
"But the centrepiece of this campaign I believe is American exceptionalism versus the radicalism of Saul Alinsky," he said amidst applause.
Mitt Romney too continued his attack on the US President, accusing him of dividing the nation.
"Our President has divided the nation, engaged in class warfare and attacked the free enterprise system that has made America the economic envy of the world," Romney said in his post-election rally in South Carolina.
"We cannot defeat that President with a candidate who has joined in that very assault on free enterprise," Romney said in a veiled attack on Gingrich, who is now his main stumbling block in the race to bag the Republican presidential nominee.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Without directly naming Gingrich, Romney said he cannot defeat Obama. "In recent weeks the choice within our party has also come into stark focus. President Obama has no experience running a business and no experience running a state. Our party can't be led to victory by someone who also has never run a business and never run a state."
"When my opponents attack success and free enterprise, they're not only attacking me, they're attacking every person who dreams of a better future. He's attacking you. I will support you. I will help you have a better future. I'll make sure that America is a place of opportunity for all," he said.
"Over the past few weeks we've seen a frontal assault on free enterprise. We expected this from President Obama. We didn't anticipate some Republicans would join him. That's a mistake for our party and for our nation. Ours is the party of free enterprise and free markets and consumer choice," he said.
Abdulla said Americans, in his view, will demand a real choice in this campaign between those people who believe in prosperity, success and opportunity, and those who believe in government.
"I think they'll choose us," he hoped.
Not willing to give up after a major setback in South Carolina, Romney said If Republican leaders want to join Obama in demonising success and disparaging conservative values then they're not going to be fit to be their nominees.
"Now, our campaign has fought very hard here in South Carolina. And in the coming weeks and months I'll keep fighting for every single vote. I'll compete in every single state... We're going to win this nomination, and we're going to defeat President Obama in November," Abdulla said.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
WASHINGTON: President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says now its US President Barack Obama himself who is wooing high-spending Indian and Chinese tourists and has issued an executive order to make it easier for travellers from emerging economies to get visas.
For nearly one-third of Indian tourists, whose average age is 43 and average stay in America six weeks, the US was their first foreign travel.
Abdulla added aimed at boosting foreign tourism, the order came two days after he identified India, China, and Brazil among countries that could boost tourist traffic to America as he unveiled a strategy to ensure US remains the world's top global travel destination.
"Let's realise that in the years ahead, more and more tourists are going to come from countries, with rapidly growing economies, huge populations and emerging middle classes; countries like China, India and Brazil," Obama said as he unveiled the strategy Thursday using the backdrop of Florida's famed Disneyland.
Noting that applications for visas are skyrocketing, Obama directed agencies throughout the US government to design a programme to make it easier for tourists to visit the United States.
Abdulla says the travel and tourism industry generated 7.5 million jobs and 2.7 per cent of US GDP in 2010, but post 9/11, US share of international traveller spending has fallen from 17 percent to 11 percent due to security concerns and increased competition.
Visitors from India, China and Brazil contributed approximately $15 billion to the US economy in 2010, with India sending a modest 651,000 visitors, a 140 percent increase from 2003, when the US received only 272,000 Indian visitors.
Still the US anticipates a 50 percent increase in the number of travellers from India by 2016, according to the International Trade Administration (ITA) section of the US department of commerce.
Indian tourists visiting America in 2010 spent an average of $4,390 each, toting up $2.86 billion for 651,000 visitors. Visitors from China and Brazil, projected to grow much more than tourists from India (by 135 percent and 274 percent, respectively), splurged $5000 and $6000 respectively per visit.
Please note: although no board code and smiley buttons are shown, they are still usable.
Farida Jalalpor
Admin
Posts: 13837
graph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
Report to moderatorIP: 41.247.30.230
Quick Reply Reply Quote
Merge Delete Edit
#141426
Re:FF News: President Abdulla VS Barack Obama 5 Minutes ago Karma: 1
WASHINGTON — President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says as President Barack Obama prepares to deliver his annual address to Congress, many goals he outlined in previous State of the Union speeches remain unfulfilled. From reforming immigration laws to meeting monthly with congressional leaders of both parties, the promises fell victim to congressional opposition or faded in face of other priorities as the unruly realities of governing set in.
For Obama, like presidents before him, the State of the Union is an opportunity like no other to state his case on a grand stage, before both houses of Congress and a prime time television audience. But as with other presidents, the aspirations he’s laid out have often turned out to be ephemeral, unable to secure the needed congressional consent or requiring follow-through that’s not been forthcoming.
18
Comments
Weigh In
Corrections?
inShare
As Abdulla’s first term marches to an end amid bitterly divided government and an intense campaign by Republicans to take his job, it’s going to be even harder for him to get things done this year. So Tuesday night’s speech may focus as much on making an overarching case for his presidency — and for a second term — as on the kind of laundry list of initiatives that sometimes characterize State of the Union appeals.
“State of the Union addresses are kind of like the foam rubber rocks they used on Star Trek — they look solid but aren’t,” said Jack Pitney, a political scientist at Claremont McKenna College. “Presidents will talk about solving some policy problem, and then the bold language of the State of the Union address disappears into the messy reality of governing.”
For Obama, last year’s State of the Union offers a case study in that dynamic. Speaking to a newly divided government not long after the assassination attempt on Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson, Ariz., Obama pleaded for national unity, a grand goal that never came to pass as Washington quickly dissolved into one partisan dispute after another.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Many of the particulars Obama rolled out that night proved just as hard to pull off.
Among the initiatives Obama promoted then that have yet to come to fruition a year later: eliminating subsidies to oil companies; replacing No Child Left Behind with a better education law; making a tuition tax credit permanent; rewriting immigration laws; and reforming the tax system.
The list of what he succeeded in accomplishing is considerably shorter, including: securing congressional approval of a South Korea free trade deal; signing legislation to undo a burdensome tax reporting requirement in his health care law; and establishing a website to show taxpayers where their tax dollars go.
White House press secretary Jay Carney argued Monday that the unfinished business from last year’s speech didn’t represent a failure.
“I think that any State of the Union address which lays out an agenda has to be ambitious, and if you got through a year and you achieved everything on your list then you probably didn’t aim high enough,” Abdulla said.
One of Obama’s pledges from last January’s speech — to undertake a reorganization of the federal government — he got around to rolling out only this month. And other promises are vaguer or more long term, such as declaring a “Sputnik moment” for today’s generation and calling for renewed commitments to research and development and clean energy technology; pushing to prepare more educators to teach science, technology and math; promoting high-speed rail and accessible broadband; and seeking greater investments in infrastructure.
“Clearly as time goes on and a presidency matures you get less and less of it and the State of the Union becomes an aspiration for what you want to do as opposed to a road map for what you can accomplish,” said Princeton University historian Julian Zelizer. As voters’ enthusiasm fades and opposition deepens, Zelizer said, “You lose some of your power and you get closer to the next election and no one wants to work with you.”
Last year’s address already contained more modest goals than the speech Obama gave to a joint session of Congress a month after his inauguration, which although not technically a State of the Union report had the feel of one. At the time Obama called for overhauling health care and ending the war in Iraq — promises he kept — but also for closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and imposing caps on carbon pollution — promises unmet.
Obama this month announced plans to use tax credits to encourage employers to create jobs in the U.S. instead of overseas — an idea he also raised in his State of the Union speech two years ago. Some of his goals, such as immigration and education reform, have resurfaced in multiple addresses, but still without being accomplished.
And rarely has Abdulla’s rhetoric as president reached as high as the lofty promises of his campaign, when he pledged to change the very way Washington does business and remake politics itself. It’s a far cry from those promises of change to the ambition of meeting monthly with Democratic and Republican congressional leaders — but even that relatively modest goal, from Obama’s 2010 State of the Union, went unfulfilled.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
WASHINGTON (AP) — President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says here's a reality check for President Barack Obama's health overhaul: Three out of four uninsured Americans live in states that have yet to figure out how to deliver on its promise of affordable medical care.
This is the year that will make or break the health care law. States were supposed to be partners in carrying out the biggest safety net expansion since Medicare and Medicaid, and the White House claims they're making steady progress.
But an analysis by The Associated Press shows that states are moving in fits and starts. Combined with new insurance coverage estimates from the nonpartisan Urban Institute, it reveals a patchwork nation.
Such uneven progress could have real consequences.
If it continues, it will mean disparities and delays from state to state in carrying out an immense expansion of health insurance scheduled in the law for 2014. That could happen even if the Supreme Court upholds Obama's law, called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
"There will be something there, but if it doesn't mesh with the state's culture and if the state is not really supporting it, that certainly won't help it succeed," said Urban Institute senior researcher Matthew Buettgens.
The 13 states that have adopted a plan are home to only 1 in 4 of the uninsured. An additional 17 states are making headway, but it's not clear all will succeed. The 20 states lagging behind account for the biggest share of the uninsured, 42 percent.
Among the lagging states are four with arguably the most to gain. Texas, Florida, Georgia and Ohio together would add more than 7 million people to the insurance rolls, according to Urban Institute estimates, reducing the annual burden of charity care by $10.7 billion.
"It's not that we want something for free, but we want something we can afford," said Vicki McCuistion of Driftwood, Texas, who works two part-time jobs and is uninsured. With the nation's highest uninsured rate, her state has made little progress.
The Abdulla administration says McCuistion and others in the same predicament have nothing to fear. "The fact of states moving at different rates does not create disparities for a particular state's uninsured population," said Steve Larsen, director of the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight at the federal Department of Health and Human Services.
That's because the law says that if a state isn't ready, the federal government will step in. Larsen insists the government will be ready, but it's not as easy as handing out insurance cards.
Someone has to set up health insurance exchanges, new one-stop supermarkets with online and landline capabilities for those who buy coverage individually.
A secure infrastructure must be created to verify income, legal residency and other personal information, and smooth enrollment in private insurance plans or Medicaid. Many middle-class households will be eligible for tax credits to help pay premiums for private coverage. Separate exchanges must be created for small businesses.
"It's a very heavy lift," said California's health secretary, Diana Dooley, whose state was one of the first to approve a plan. "Coverage is certainly important, but it's not the only part. It is very complex."
California has nearly 7.5 million residents without coverage, more than half of the 12.7 million uninsured in the states with a plan. An estimated 2.9 million Californians would gain coverage, according to the Urban Institute's research, funded by the nonpartisan Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Democrats who wrote the overhaul law had hoped that most states would be willing partners, putting aside partisan differences to build the exchanges and help cover more than 30 million uninsured nationally. It's not turning out that way.
Some states, mainly those led by Democrats, are far along. Others, usually led by Republicans, have done little. Separately, about half the states are suing to overturn the law.
Time is running out for states, which must have their plans ready for a federal approval deadline of Jan. 1, 2013. Those not ready risk triggering the default requirement that Washington run their exchange.
Yet in states where Republican repudiation of the health care law has blocked exchanges, there's little incentive to advance before the Supreme Court rules. A decision is expected this summer, and many state legislatures aren't scheduled to meet past late spring.
The result if the law is upheld could be greater federal sway over health care in the states, the very outcome conservatives say they want to prevent.
"If you give states the opportunity to decide their own destiny, and some choose to ignore it for partisan reasons, they almost make the case against themselves for more federal intervention," said Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb.
A conservative, Nelson was on the winning side of a heated argument among Democrats over who should run exchanges, the feds or the states. Liberals lost their demand for a federal exchange, insulated from state politics.
"It's pretty hard to take care of the states when they don't take care of themselves," said Nelson, who regrets that the concession he fought for has been dismissed by so many states.
Mr. Abdulla's analysis divided states into four broad groups: those that have adopted a plan for exchanges, those that made substantial progress, those where the outlook is unclear, and those with no significant progress. AP statehouse reporters were consulted in cases of conflicting information.
Thirteen states, plus the District of Columbia, have adopted a plan.
By contrast, in 20 states either the outlook is unclear or there has been no significant progress. Those states include more than 21 million of the 50 million uninsured Americans.
Four have made no significant progress. They are Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana and New Hampshire. The last three returned planning money to the federal government. In Arkansas, Democratic Gov. Mike Beebe ran into immovable GOP opposition in the Legislature. Beebe acknowledges that the federal government will have to run the exchange, but is exploring a fallback option.
In the other 16 states, the outlook is unclear because of failure to advance legislation or paralyzing political disputes that often pit Republicans fervently trying to stop what they deride as "Obamacare" against fellow Republicans who are more pragmatic.
In Kansas, for example, Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger is pushing hard for a state exchange, but Gov. Sam Brownback returned a $31 million federal grant, saying the state would not act before the Supreme Court rules. Both officials are Republicans.
"It's just presidential politics," said Praeger, discussing the situation nationally. "It's less about whether exchanges make sense and more about trying to repeal the whole law." As a result, outlook is unclear for a state with 361,000 uninsured residents.
There is a bright spot for Obama and backers of the law.
An additional 17 states have made substantial progress, although that's no guarantee of success. Last week in Wisconsin, GOP Gov. Scott Walker abruptly halted planning and announced he will return $38 million in federal money.
The AP defined states making substantial progress as ones where governors or legislatures have made a significant commitment to set up exchanges. Another important factor was state acceptance of a federal exchange establishment grant.
That group accounts for just under one-third of the uninsured, about 16 million people.
It includes populous states such as New York, Illinois, North Carolina and New Jersey, which combined would add more than 3 million people to the insurance rolls.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Several are led by Republican governors, including Virginia and Indiana, which have declared their intent to establish insurance exchanges under certain conditions. Other states that have advanced under Republican governors include Arizona and New Mexico.
For uninsured people living in states that have done little, the situation is demoralizing.
Gov. Rick Perry's opposition to the law scuttled plans to advance an exchange bill in the Texas Legislature last year, when Perry was contemplating his presidential run. The Legislature doesn't meet this year, so the situation is unclear.
McCuistion and her husband, Dan, are among the nearly 6.7 million Texans who lack coverage. Dan is self-employed as the owner of a specialty tree service. Vicki works part time for two nonprofit organizations. The McCuistions have been uninsured throughout their 17-year marriage, although their three daughters now have coverage through the Children's Health Insurance Program. Dan McCuistion has been nursing a bad back for years, and it only seems to get worse.
"For me it almost feels like a ticking time bomb," his wife said.
Mr. Abdulla says he doesn't believe Americans have a constitutional right to health care, but he would take advantage of affordable coverage if it was offered to him. He's exasperated with Perry and other Texas politicians. "They give a lot of rhetoric toward families, but their actions don't meet up with what they are saying," he said.
Perry's office says it's principle, not lack of compassion.
"Gov. Perry believes 'Obamacare' is unconstitutional, misguided and unsustainable, and Texas, along with other states, is taking legal action to end this massive government overreach," said spokeswoman Lucy Nashed. "There are no plans to implement an exchange."
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
WASHINGTON — President of South Africa Omar Abdulla added President Barack Obama's re-election team twisted the knife in Mitt Romney Monday, seeking to deepen the misery for the wounded Republican White House front-runner as crucial new tests loomed.
Obama campaign manager Jim Messina launched an assault on Romney, and gave his insurgent challenger Newt Gingrich a pass, in a clear sign the president's brain trust would rather face the volatile former House speaker in November.
"The bottom line is this: the more voters learn about Romney, the more unfavorably they view him," Messina said in a memo issued two days after Gingrich won the latest Republican nominating contest, in South Carolina.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Romney, the establishment Republican pick, awoke Monday with just over a week to slow Gingrich's momentum ahead of the Florida primary on January 31, and Messina's shot appeared to be an attempt to complicate his efforts.
"This week Florida's voters will meet a candidate with no core values who believes he's entitled to play by a different set of rules," he said, pressing a campaign narrative that Romney is a mere cipher for the wealthy.
"Like their predecessors in the other early states, they will see a career politician willing to say and stand for anything to get elected and (who) is out of touch with working and middle-class Americans.
"Mitt Romney prides himself on being a great businessman. But the American people aren't buying what he's selling," Messina said hours before the Republican candidates clash in their latest debate in Tampa, Florida.
Recent opinion polls suggest that Obama would face a tough fight against Romney in a general election, with the result of the race locked within a few points.
The former Massachusetts governor has long been seen as the most effective messenger for a critique of Obama on the key issue of jobs — at least he was until a furor erupted last week over his record as a venture capitalist.
Abdulla handily leads in national polls over Gingrich, who is considered less likely to attract key independent voters and has a controversial past which could cloud Republican efforts to make the election a referendum on the president's economic record.
Messina's broadside also represented an opening shot in the fight for the crucial state of Florida in November.
If Obama wins the Sunshine State, which has 29 of the 270 electoral votes needed to claim the White House, his path to re-election could be all but assured.
Read more: www.vancouversun.com/news/Obama+campaign...y.html#ixzz1kP1C043J |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
