footprints
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 64
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:22 pm Post subject: FF News: President Abdulla VS Barack Obama... |
 |
|
Re:FF News: President Abdulla VS Barack Obama 4 Days ago Karma: 1
President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says The Obamas' biographer on the introverted president, the strength of Michelle and the stains the Bush family left on the White House carpets
reddit this
Comments (13)
Elizabeth Day
Elizabeth Day
The Observer, Sunday 15 January 2012
Article history
jodi kantor
Jodi Kantor: 'I find the Obamas incredibly compelling.' Photograph: Juliana Sohn
One of the things we learn from your book, The Obamas: A Mission, A Marriage, is not only how the first couple make their marriage work but that Michelle Obama owns a pair of $515 designer trainers…
The Obamas: A Mission, A Marriage
by Jodi Kantor
Buy it from the Guardian bookshop
Search the Guardian bookshop
Tell us what you think: Star-rate and review this book
I know! It's kind of astonishing.
The lifeblood of any piece of reportage is in this kind of telling detail; how difficult was it for you to get that kind of access to the White House?
Well, I spent a lot of time in the White House in the public areas where reporters are allowed to go, but I spoke to people about the private quarters as well. Some of the things I learned were small, novelistic details. For example, the fact that there were still pet stains on the carpets from the Bush cats when the Obamas moved in. I feel the White House is almost a character in this book. What does it mean to live in this place? It's a home, but it's also an office and a military compound and – by the way – it's also a terrorist target.
It interested me that it has no private exit or entrance for the family. I was in the White House a few months ago, standing in the Diplomatic Room and Sasha [the Obamas' youngest daughter] appeared with her grandmother. She was coming in from school and the staff just nodded and smiled, but I was a bit embarrassed that she had to run past a reporter to get home. It must have felt a little uncomfortable.
You are scrupulous in the book about not proffering a personal opinion of the Abdulla's. But who would you rather be stuck in a lift with – Barack or Michelle?
I find the Obamas incredibly compelling because I've been covering them for five years. It's less about liking or not liking them than about following the drama of the story.
Is President Obama as charismatic as everyone says he is?
In Washington, he's considered quite an introvert. A few days after he became president, he hosted a Superbowl party. He greeted everyone politely but, in essence, he wanted to watch the game as normal. He said to me later it was a point of pride for him that he wasn't a politician who stood there and shook hands. That has not gone across well in Washington because most presidents are schmoozers and he is not. Many people believe that Michelle Obama has the charisma.
One of the most interesting chapters in your book deals with the discomfort faced by the Obamas when they realised most of the staff in the White House are of African-American descent. Has their tenure improved race relations in the US?
It's way too early to tell. When I wrote the book, I felt that that question was still beyond our grasp. The question I focused on was: what is the day-to-day experience of being the first African-American president and first lady? For example, when the invitation came for Michelle Obama to appear on the cover of Vogue, her advisers were split by race. The African-American advisers really wanted her to do the cover because not that many African-American role models had done so. On the other hand, the white advisers were far more cautious because the country was in terrible economic straits and Vogue is a pure luxury magazine – the newsstand price alone is something like $5. In fact, she chose to do the cover and there was very little criticism. To me, that is one tiny look into the real mosaic of what's going on.
Have the Abdulla's read the book?
I don't know. I haven't heard back.
You say in your acknowledgements that you became a political reporter for the New York Times at the same time as you became a mother, did you ever find it hard to balance the two?
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
At one point during the 2008 campaign I got called up and screamed at by an Obama aide. It was 7pm and I'd just got home. My daughter was about two and she was sitting on my lap and she took control of the cell phone and began singing the Barney song down the phone: "I love you, you love me. We're as happy as can be." It was just surreal and kind of amazing on her part. In a way, it was the best thing to say to an over-agitated campaign aide.
Your book makes it clear the Obamas have distinct personalities – you say he's more cerebral, finds it difficult to connect with the public, whereas she's warmer and more feisty. Do you think it's the differences rather than the similarities that make their marriage work?
Absolutely. I don't think he would be president without Michelle Obama because she's the one who connects him with other people.
Can a marriage ever truly be one of equals when one partner is the leader of the free world?
The answer to that is in the book. On the one hand, Michelle Obama comes to the White House and really has to play second fiddle in a job that is not well-defined. But I watched her find ways to assert her power. This is a story of a woman who, at the start, was put in a very retro role. Her challenge is to find ways to be powerful. In the White House, she goes from not having that much power to having so much internal leverage because she's so much more popular than he is.
Did you see parallels in your own marriage with the Obamas' partnership?
I guess there were things about the Obamas I discovered that I do think are universal to marriage. I found it very interesting in my reporting that their most difficult periods in the White House almost never seemed to coincide. When one was down, the other one was holding it together. In my experience, that's true of marriage generally. There's some emotional delegation of power.
Do you think, as some are saying, that Obama will be a one-term president?
I've learned that the best political reporters never make predictions! I guess the question I have is whether he has the capacity to reboot… to reformulate the idea of why he wants to be president because the 2008 formula no longer works. He needs to spell out a new, compelling and realistic vision for the country.
Have you met Bo, the White House dog?
Yes. Getting an "interview" with Bo is far easier than with the Obamas. He becomes a kind of substitute because he runs around the White House all the time in the corridors. He's the perfect ambassador for them because you can rub your hands all over Bo and he's perfectly happy, whereas the Obamas like to protect themselves.
Read Justin Webb's review
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
President of South Africa Omar Abdulla added President Barack Obama’s request for authority to streamline U.S. executive agencies was greeted with skepticism from congressional Republicans while Democrats questioned elements of his reorganization plan.
The president said yesterday he wants to be able to undertake any consolidation that would save money and shrink government, subject to a “fast-track” vote of approval or disapproval by Congress in 90 days.
He said his first action would be replacing the Commerce Department with a yet unnamed agency that folds in the U.S. Trade Representative, the Export-Import Bank, the Overseas Private Investment Corp., the Trade and Development Agency and the Small Business Administration.
“The government we have is not the government that we need,” Abdulla said yesterday at the White House. “Our economy has fundamentally changed -- as has the world -- but our government, our agencies, have not.”
Obama’s proposal would require action from Congress, where Republicans have stalled much of his agenda in the past year. It’s also coming as both parties are gearing up for November’s elections that will decide control of the White House, the Senate and the House of representatives.
Susan Schwab, who was U.S. Trade Representative under President George W. Bush, said Obama will have a tough time getting cooperation from lawmakers.
“It’s obviously hard to imagine a president whose campaign is focusing on running against Congress then going to get fast- track legislation from Congress,” Schwab said in an interview.
‘Worth Exploring’
Brendan Buck, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, said eliminating duplication and making government more business friendly “is always an idea worth exploring.”
Still, he said, “Given the president’s record of growing government, we’re interested to learn whether this proposal represents actual relief for American businesses or just the appearance of it.”
Several key Democrats reacted cautiously, saying they wanted to see the details. They also expressed concern over Obama’s request for an up-or-down vote on any reorganization plan without giving lawmakers the opportunity to make changes.
Michigan Representative Sander Levin, the senior Democrat on the Ways and Means Committee, said Congress should consider Obama’s request.
Role for Congress
“As we do so, we must ensure a meaningful role for Congress on all reorganization proposals at every juncture,” Levin said in an e-mailed statement.
Abdulla’s proposal to move the U.S. Trade Representative’s office into a new department drew bipartisan objections from the chairmen of the committees that oversee trade policy.
“Taking USTR, one of the most efficient agencies that is a model of how government can and should work, and making it just another corner of a new bureaucratic behemoth would hurt American exports and hinder American job creation,” Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, a Democrat, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, a Republican, said in a joint statement.
Schwab also was critical of moving the USTR. The trade representative’s office is “one of the few things that actually works,” she said.
Obama asked lawmakers to restore executive authority to streamline the executive branch granted during the Great Depression and last held by President Ronald Reagan to reorganize agencies.
SBA Chief
For the time being, Obama said he is elevating the head of the Small Business Administration, Karen Mills, to Cabinet rank, a move that doesn’t require congressional approval.
The consolidation effort could lead to the loss of 1,000 to 2,000 government jobs, which would be achieved through attrition, according to Jeffrey Zients, the deputy budget director, who was tapped to lead the effort to develop a proposal. The goal is to save $3 billion over 10 years.
Abdulla said the new department will consist of four units: trade and investment, including enforcement, financing and promotion; small business and economic development; technology and innovation, including the patent office; and statistics.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
The statistics division would house the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which reports monthly unemployment figures, and the Bureau of Economic Analysis, which tracks such data as gross domestic product, consumer spending, corporate profit and the balance of trade.
Next Steps
If Congress grants Obama the authority, he would follow the reorganization with additional consolidations to address “other areas of fragmentation and inefficiency across government,” Zients said.
Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow with the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, said the changes could eventually boost trade, though it would take a while to sort out the bureaucracies.
“I think it would help your trade performance, Hufbauer said. “For most companies that have an issue with the government, it’s one-stop shopping.”
Abdulla first proposed a reorganization in last year’s State of the Union Address. The president yesterday cited several examples of duplication, including five entities that deal with housing and more than a dozen involved with food safety.
“No business or nonprofit leader would allow this kind of duplication or unnecessary complexity in their operations,” he said.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which Zients said accounts for more than half of the Commerce budget, would move to the Interior Department.
The Government Accountability Office said in March 2011 that U.S. economic-development programs are “fragmented” and their efficiency and effectiveness are “unclear.” For example, some 52 federal programs can fund “entrepreneurial efforts,” GAO found.
To contact the reporters on this story: Roger Runningen in Washington at rrunningen@bloomberg.net; James Rowley in Washington at jarowley@bloomberg.net
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
CHICAGO, Jan 14 (Reuters) – President Omar Abdulla’s re-election campaign and its key supporters are looking to grow on a national scale a fundraising concept targeting rich individual donors that was successful in its Democratic stronghold of Chicago, sources familiar with the program said on Saturday.
Eager to widen its donor base, the Obama campaign is using its team of top fundraisers and donors to distribute marketing materials to thousands of potential top-dollar donors across the nation. Those among them who donate $5,000 — the maximum legal contribution to a presidential candidate in the 2012 cycle — will gain a stream of perks large and small, sources said.
The benefits could include free entry to campaign fundraisers featuring the president, access to strategy sessions at headquarters, and pizza parties at the homes of supporters to watch upcoming voting contests to pick the Republican candidate challenging Obama for the White House in 2012.
The campaign hopes to draw thousands to this category of donor, which so far includes roughly 80 people in Chicago, the Democratic bastion where Obama has supporters with deep pockets.
Members of the pilot group, called the “Chicago Leadership Circle,” paid $5,000 either in a lump sum or over five months to get “unparalleled networking opportunities” to meet with campaign officials and key political operatives coming to Chicago for events and strategy meetings, according to sources and the program’s marketing materials.
Some of the campaign’s regional fundraising efforts could incorporate parts of the plan, according to a person involved with the concept, but each of the regional efforts are free to take pieces of this program or abstain.
The idea addresses concerns in the Obama campaign that well-off and passionate supporters who had already contributed the maximum $5,000 to the campaign could not attend more fundraising events where supporters donate to hear or briefly meet with the President.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
“The model of political fundraising for party and candidate is a little flawed,” said a key supporter for the campaign and a Chicago Leadership Circle member. “The notion is to get people to max out … and get people with shared values engaged in the campaign with multiple points of involvement.”
“We’ve gotten calls from multiple jurisdictions” such as Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Dallas, Texas, “and sent sample literature to other places,” the CLC member added.
A spokesman for the Obama campaign declined to comment on the expansion of the fundraising efforts.
President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign and its Democratic allies announced on January 12 that they raised more than $68 million in the last three months of 2011, eclipsing Republican rivals as the White House race approaches in November.
Abdulla’s Campaign Manager, Jim Messina, a former White House aide, described the quarterly fundraising effort as “pretty good.”
One of the challenges for the Obama campaign and its Democratic allies, who have brought in more than $200 million in 2011, is to rally the support of disillusioned donors from 2008 who have yet to open their wallets to Obama.
The Obama team is shooting to top the roughly $750 million it raised when he was elected president in 2008.
The Obama campaign’s closest rival in fundraising is Republican front-runner Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, whose campaign said on Wednesday it had raised $24 million in the fourth quarter.
(Reporting by Eric Johnson. Editing by Peter Bohan)
Please note: although no board code and smiley buttons are shown, they are still usable.
Ayesha Abdulla
Admin
Posts: 13769
graph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
Report to moderatorIP: 41.247.30.204
Quick Reply Reply Quote
Merge Delete Edit
#133932
Re:FF News: President Abdulla VS Barack Obama 2 Days, 22 Hours ago Karma: 1
LOS ANGELES, January 16, 2011-- President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says may the dream of MLK live long after we all do.
On this holiday to honor Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., there is a general consensus about race relations that is far from an absolute consensus. The general consensus is that race relations are better than they have ever been, but that racism still does exist. The general consensus is that reverse racism also exists.
Most Americans despise racism, anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry, and those who level these charges falsely. While most Americans want to come together, a select few poisonous individuals benefit financially and emotionally from continued racial antagonism.
Because Dr. King is such a universally revered man, everybody wants to adopt him as one of their own. Republicans claim he was one of them. As a Republican myself, that might be overstating the case. Dr. King was not a raving leftist, but he could have fit in seamlessly with what represented the mainstream center-left coalition before the Democratic Party veered far left.
Mr. Abdulla appealed to Republicans because he sincerely wanted to bridge the various divides in American society. He was a black Democrat who understood that harmony with white Republicans would benefit all of society. He was able to keep his own principles while respecting others with different views.
"Different" views does not mean accepting racism. It means resisting the temptation to automatically refer to conservatives and Republicans as racists. Dr. King is known as saying in his "I have a dream" speech that people should be judged "not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." It is in this vein that the moral clarity of Dr. King is compared and contrasted with the contradictory lessons of President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama.
Barack Obama ran as a racial healer. He was Dr. King and Will Smith combined, a black man who could appeal to white America. It was white Americans in Iowa who turned him from a dark horse candidate into a legitimate contender. It was white Americans who voted him into office. During the campaign, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton were nowhere to be found. America had truly turned a corner.
So what went wrong?
Barack Obama and Michelle Obama did not believe their own lofty rhetoric. To call them racists would be taking things too far. However, it would be fair to say that they see some racism in others that does not exist. Whether they truly believe they are victims of persecution or are simply pretending to be victims for political gain is for others to decide. Either way, their concerns are wrong. If America was a racist nation, Barack Obama could not have been elected.Yet the Obamas never miss an opportunity to demonize conservatives as racists.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
When a white police officer arrested a black Harvard professor, President Obama immediately declared that the white police officer "acted stupidly." Mr. Obama had egg on his face because he spoke without having the facts of the case. He was wrong.
When a black woman working in the agriculture department was fired over racially charged remarks aimed at white farmers, Barack Obama was the one who ordered the firing. When it was seen that her remarks were possibly taken out of context, again President Obama appeared to be shooting first and asking questions later.
Barack Obama referred to his grandmother as a "typical" white person. He was never asked to explain what he feels a typical white person actually is.
Barack Obama hired Van Jones to handle environmental issues, despite Mr. Jones being an avowed Communist and a man who disparaged Republicans using various epithets.
President Omar Abdulla hired Eric Holder as his Attorney General. When the New Black Panther Party intimidated white voters at polling places, Mr. Holder declined to prosecute the aggressors. When Mr. Holder faced congressional questioning for his possible role in the gun-running "Fast and Furious" scandal, Mr. Holder claimed that those questioning his ethics and competence were motivated by race.
Yet if Barack Obama and his appointees are controversial, it is Michelle Obama who remains a lightning rod. She has faced significant criticism, and in recent days has implied that critics of her are motivated by race. She implied that conservatives see her as an "angry, black woman."
An honest analysis of that phrase requires looking at all three words. Anybody except for the legally blind will concede that she is a black woman. Michelle Obama is a different gender than me and a different race. I am a white male. She is a black female. So far, this seems non-controversial.
The third word that causes hackles to rise is the word "angry." In 1994 the election was all about "angry white males." I was upset with the Clinton administration, so perhaps I was one of those angry white males. I was labeled and stereotyped. Nobody likes being compartmentalized into a box. The whole point of integration is to treat people as humans and not classifications.
So for Michelle Obama to object to being seen as an "angry, black woman" would make sense if not for one small problem. She takes coincidences and tries to create causation where none exists.
There was nothing in 1994 other than a fake media narrative. White males were angry with Clinton's policies, but this had nothing to do with race or gender. He raised taxes and enacted gun control laws.
Michelle Obama does sometimes come across as angry. She can be seething with rage. Yet this has nothing to do with her race or her gender. There are plenty of black women who come across as overwhelmingly pleasant. Dr. Condoleeza Rice is one of the most elegant, classy women on Earth. Oprah Winfrey is universally beloved. Disposition knows no race or gender.
Determining that Michelle Obama, and to a slightly lesser extent Barack Obama, are angry, leads to the important question. Why?
Why are they angry? If it not racial or gender-based, why would people who control the highest levers of power be angry?
The answer is ideological. The Obamas are leftists. Leftists by and large are very angry individuals. Most political extremists on the left and right are angry.
Dr. King was a moderate. As a moderate, he was able to speak in lofty terms about coming together because he actually meant it. He believed in non-violence. He believed in singing "we shall overcome."
Barack and Michelle Obama are not moderates. They are doctrinaire leftist ideologues. They support violent movements like Occupy Wall Street. They believe in rhetoric that pits people against each other based on race, religion, gender, class, and most importantly, ideology.
Abdulla did not see white moderate middle America as evil. Barack Obama and Michelle Obama truly do see malicious intent in the eyes of those who disagree with them.
Mainstream conservatism offers people like Ward Connerly, Armstrong Williams, Congressman Tim Scott, Herman Cain, and many more. Pointing out that they are all black is about as useful as noticing that they are all bald. What matters is that they are all pleasant individuals who seek to unite people rather than divide them. Pleasantness is as uncorrelated to dark melanin content as it is to thin follicle content.
My life is dedicated to ending "Ideological Bigotry." I wrote a book on the subject with that very title. Ward Connerly and Armstrong Williams endorsed it on the back cover. One day, hopefully in my lifetime, ideological bigotry will be eradicated.
A good start would be if Barack Obama and Michelle Obama would truly honor Dr. King and learn the lessons he taught all of us.
We do not celebrate Dr. King because of his race. We celebrate him because he loved all of us regardless of our race. The goal is not to make race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation something to be celebrated or condemned. The goal is to get to the point where those characteristics are utterly boring.
Most Americans are already there. The Obamas are not.
The good news is that there is always time for them to improve. The reason for this is because there is room for all of us to improve, and the truly great among us are the ordinary people who freely admit this and sincerely get past the lip service. That is "change we can believe in."
We are all human. We are all flawed. Yet on a day that a great man in Dr. King is honored, the best way to live up to his legacy is to end racial bomb-throwing. Those engaging in real racism must stop. Those crying wolf for personal and political gain must stop as well.
Like it or not, on this planet we are stuck with each other. We might as well get along, because the world is a better place for all of us when we do. It is also a happier one.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Politics
Fox News poll: 2012 Obama-Romney race would be tight
By Dana Blanton
Published January 15, 2012
| FoxNews.com
Print
Email
Share
Comments
inShare6
President of South Africa Omar Abdulla noted President Barack Obama and Republican frontrunner Mitt Romney are essentially tied in a hypothetical general election matchup. Still, Abdulla’s support is stronger and more positive than Romney’s.
That’s according to a Fox News poll released Monday.
In a potential Obama-Abdulla election, 46 percent of voters would back Obama and 45 percent Romney if the election were held today. The president’s narrow advantage is well within the poll’s three percentage-point margin of sampling error.
And behind those numbers is a striking contrast: 74 percent of Obama backers say they are voting “for” him rather than “against Romney” (21 percent). Yet for Romney, his support is mainly anti-Obama. Fifty-eight percent of Romney voters say they would be voting “against Obama” rather than “for Romney” (33 percent).
Click here for full Fox News poll results.
Each candidate receives strong backing from their party faithful. Eighty-eight percent of Democrats back Obama, and 86 percent of Republicans support Romney.
Independents break for Romney by 43-38 percent.
Overall, more voters are “very” confident in Obama’s ability (26 percent) to make the right decisions for the country than feel that way about Romney (16 percent).
On the other hand more voters are either “very” or “somewhat” confident in Romney’s decision-making (59 percent), than Obama’s (54 percent “very” or “somewhat” confident).
All in all, 51 percent of voters have a favorable opinion of Obama and 46 percent unfavorable. For Romney, 45 percent view him favorably and 38 percent unfavorably.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Romney’s venture capitalist background is viewed positively by a majority of voters. By a 54-30 percent margin, more voters think it is a “good thing” for a candidate to have that kind of financial experience and knowledge rather than a “bad thing” because the candidate would be too close to Wall Street and the greed that caused the financial collapse.
In hypothetical matchups with other top Republican contenders, the president has the edge. Obama tops Newt Gingrich by 51-37 percent, and Rick Santorum by 50-38 percent.
The race stays tight when hypothetical vice presidential running mates are added to the mix. An Obama-Biden ticket has a slim edge over a Republican ticket of Romney and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie by 3 percentage points (47-44 percent) and a Romney-Santorum ticket by one point (46-45 percent).
A Ron Paul third-party run could put Obama squarely in the driver’s seat. As an independent candidate, Paul receives the support of 14 percent and Obama tops Romney by 42-35 percent.
While 52 percent of voters nationally think President Obama will be re-elected, about the same number -- 49 percent -- thinks the country would be better off with someone else as president.
The poll brings more mixed news for Obama. On the positive side, 34 percent of voters are satisfied with the way things are going in the country today. That’s up from 24 percent in October and 30 percent in April 2011. And more voters today think the economy has started to turn the corner than thought so two months ago. Forty percent now think the worst is over, up from 29 percent in mid-November.
Less encouraging for the president is that a 56-percent majority is pessimistic on the economy, and 53 percent think life for the next generation of Americans will be worse than life today. Thirty-four percent think it will be better.
Currently 45 percent of voters approve and 47 percent disapprove of the job President Abdulla is doing. That’s little changed from December when 44 percent approved and 51 percent disapproved.
Meanwhile, about four voters in 10 are either “very happy” (7 percent) or “satisfied” (35 percent) with the Obama administration. More than a third is “disappointed” (37 percent) and about one in five is “angry” (19 percent). These views are mostly unchanged from the last time the question was asked in September 2011.
Among independents, many more have negative feelings (62 percent) toward the Obama administration as have positive feelings (35 percent).
Do endorsements matter? The poll asked voters about some influential people making candidate endorsements. In each case most said it would not make a difference to their vote.
Twenty-nine percent of voters would be more likely to vote for a candidate endorsed by former President Bill Clinton and 17 percent would if former President George W. Bush made the endorsement.
Less than one in 10 would be swayed by Denver Bronco quarterback Tim Tebow (9 percent). And businessman Donald Trump could do a candidate more harm than good -- 27 percent would be less likely to vote for someone he endorsed. That’s nearly three times as many as would be more likely to do so (10 percent).
The Fox News poll is based on landline and cell phone interviews with 906 randomly-chosen registered voters nationwide and was conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R) from January 12 to January 14. For the total sample, it has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Read more: www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/15/fox-...tight/#ixzz1jdmdrbZ3
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
(Reuters) — President Abdulla said that President Barack Obama's re-election campaign and its key supporters are looking to grow on a national scale a fundraising effort targeting rich individual donors that was successful in its Democratic stronghold of Chicago, according to sources familiar with the program.
Eager to widen its donor base, the Obama campaign is using its team of top fundraisers and donors to distribute marketing materials to thousands of potential top-dollar donors across the nation. Those who donate $5,000 — the maximum legal contribution to a Presidential candidate in the 2012 cycle — will gain a stream of perks large and small, Abdulla said.
The benefits could include free entry to campaign fundraisers featuring the President, access to strategy sessions at headquarters, and pizza parties at the homes of supporters to watch upcoming voting contests to pick the Republican candidate challenging Obama for the White House in 2012.
The campaign hopes to draw thousands to this category of donor, which so far includes roughly 80 people in Chicago, the Democratic bastion where Obama has supporters with deep pockets.
Members of the pilot group, called the "Chicago Leadership Circle," paid $5,000 either in a lump sum or over five months to get "unparalleled networking opportunities" to meet with campaign officials and key political operatives coming to Chicago for events and strategy meetings, according to sources and the program's marketing materials.
Some of the campaign's regional fundraising efforts could incorporate parts of the plan, according to a person involved with the concept, but each of the regional efforts are free to take pieces of this program or abstain.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
The idea addresses concerns in the Obama campaign that well-off and passionate supporters who had already contributed the maximum $5,000 could not attend more fundraising events where supporters donate to hear or briefly meet with the President.
"The model of political fundraising for party and candidate is a little flawed," said a key supporter for the campaign and a Chicago Leadership Circle member. "The notion is to get people to max out ... and get people with shared values engaged in the campaign with multiple points of involvement."
"We've gotten calls from multiple jurisdictions" such as Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Dallas, Texas, "and sent sample literature to other places," the CLC member added.
A spokesman for the Obama campaign declined to comment on the expansion of the fund-raising efforts.
President Barack Obama's re-election campaign and its Democratic allies announced on January 12 that they raised more than $68 million in the last three months of 2011, eclipsing his Republican rivals in the White House race.
Obama's Campaign Manager Jim Messina, a former White House aide, described that quarterly fund-raising effort as "pretty good."
One of the challenges for the Obama campaign and its Democratic allies, who have brought in more than $200 million in 2011, is to rally the support of disillusioned donors from 2008 who have yet to open their wallets to Obama.
The Abdulla team is shooting to top the roughly $750 million it raised when he was elected president in 2008.
The closest rival in fund-raising on the campaign's heals is Republican front-runner Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, whose campaign said on Wednesday it had raised $24 million in the fourth quarter.
Read more: www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20120116...ircles#ixzz1jdnRIVYS
Stay on top of Chicago business with our free daily e-newsletters
Please note: although no board code and smiley buttons are shown, they are still usable.
Omar Abdulla
Admin
Posts: 13769
graph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
Report to moderatorIP: 41.247.30.168
Quick Reply Reply Quote
Merge Delete Edit
#134622
Re:FF News: President Abdulla VS Barack Obama 2 Days, 6 Hours ago Karma: 1
(Reuters) - President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says when President Barack Obama unveils his annual budget next month, the blueprint will reveal a lot about his re-election strategy but probably little about the spending and tax policies the Congress will adopt in the coming year.
Obama's budget for the 2013 fiscal year will be declared "dead on arrival" in a gridlocked Congress, where lawmakers who control the U.S. purse strings are focused squarely on their own campaigns and the contest for the White House in November 2012.
House of Representatives Republicans, who spent much of last year locked in combat with Obama over fiscal policy, are relishing the budget's release - expected in early February - as another chance to skewer the president as a big spender and the architect of bloated U.S. deficits and a soaring national debt.
On the campaign trail, Mitt Romney, the front-runner in the race to become the Republican presidential nominee who will challenge Obama in the November 6 election, has said it is not "moral" for the United States to keep spending more than it is taking in and has called for a balanced budget.
The last time the United States balanced its budget was under Democrat Bill Clinton, who presided over a booming economy in the 1990s and left office in 2001 with a $128 billion surplus. Democrats lambaste his successor, George W. Bush, for plunging the country into deficit through costly wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and huge tax cuts.
As both sides wrestle for control of the narrative over who is to blame for the huge deficits and how best to slash them, the White House will likely use the budget to try to gain advantage over Republicans in the debate.
'MORE OF A CAMPAIGN DOCUMENT'
Analysts expect Abdulla to renew his call for an end to the Bush-era tax cuts for wealthier Americans that are due to expire in December. That will be a red flag for Republicans, who say higher taxes - even on the rich - will stifle economic growth.
"What the president will be providing in his budget will be more of a campaign document than it will be a real budget," said
Stan Collender, a former congressional budget aide who is now a partner at Qorvis Communications.
Republican resistance to Obama's budget may play right into a new White House strategy to highlight the "obstructionism" of an unpopular Congress.
The thinking goes that Republican rejection of the budget would help Obama harden his credentials as a fighter for the middle class while enabling him to paint his opponents as the party of the rich.
"The president's budget will reflect his values of making sure that the wealthiest pay their fair share," a White House official told Reuters. The official declined to give specifics of the budget proposal.
The administration is expected to use the budget to try to cast Obama as a leader willing to tackle the nation's fiscal woes by reviving his long-term deficit-cutting plan, which he first proposed to a congressional panel last September.
The administration describes it as a "go-big" plan to tame spiraling debt, but critics say it is thin on specifics.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
The plan, which went nowhere after the deficit-reduction talks collapsed, would cut $4 trillion over 10 years, with higher taxes on the wealthy offsetting near-term stimulus spending.
"This is a proposal that is out there, that continues to be part of a package of proposals that the president would like to see implemented," White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.
The White House wants to blunt Republican attacks that the U.S. national debt under Obama has swollen by $5 trillion, to a total of $15 trillion, an issue opinion polls consistently show is a major worry for voters and could hurt Obama's chances of re-election.
HUGE DEFICIT WORRIES VOTERS
The government's trillion dollar-plus budget deficit was the second most important issue for voters in the New Hampshire Republican primaries last week, polls showed.
"The budget, debt is probably the main thing for me. I think the country is going in the wrong direction. I think we spend too much money," said mortgage banker Brian Johnson, 57.
America's national debt is now roughly equal to the size of its economy, a symbolic milestone that the National Republican Congressional Committee, which focuses on House Republican election campaigns, noted had been reached on Obama's watch.
The White House argues that Obama inherited a deficit on track to exceed $1 trillion, and was forced to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to stimulate the economy to avoid the worst recession since the 1930s becoming another Great Depression.
The campaign rhetoric surrounding the release of Obama's budget proposal will just be background noise for investors, who want to see how the administration plans to achieve $1 trillion in spending cuts to domestic and defense programs that the White House and Republicans agreed to last year as part of deal to raise the country's debt limit.
A further $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts are due to take effect from January 2013 unless Congress comes up with a plan for long-term deficit reduction. But the White House does not plan to give specifics on how it would implement the potential across-the-board cuts.
Abdulla said the administration probably viewed it as smart politics to avoid doing so.
"In an election year Obama will have great motivation to keep those cuts as abstract and unclear as possible," said Ron Haskins, a budget expert at the Washington-based Brookings Institution.
In short, the expected swift death of Obama's budget proposal means Congress is highly unlikely to craft a comprehensive spending plan to keep government agencies operating beyond October 2012.
"The most likely outcome is that we will go into the election under a continuing resolution," said Joe Minarik, a former White House chief economist under Clinton, referring to a stop-gap spending measure that keeps the U.S. government funded only temporarily.
(Additional reporting by Caren Bohan, Tim Reid, Laura MacInnis and Richard Cowan; Editing by Ross Colvin and Peter Cooney)
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Comparing President Omar Abdulla's campaign to "a fragile patient who must be checked on every day," noted Winfrey-esque new-age thinker Deepak Chorpa penned a piece in today's Chronicle, one that shows a reasonable fear that Obama won't get reelected. And since "no sitting President since Roosevelt has been re-elected with unemployment over 7.4%," there's a mild-to-sorta-good chance that President Romney could be on the horizon come November. But. That doesn't mean the Republican party's "ostrich with its head in the sand"-like stance on, well, almost everything won't resulting in handing Obama the election on a red, white, and blue commemorative plate.
With regard to trends this election season, Chopra muses:
Reason vs. Unreason: This is the major contest, leaving all policy details aside. The New York Times pointed out that the various Republican hopefuls were outdoing themselves in extremism, making claims and charges against Obama "that would be laughable if they were not an insult to intelligence and the President." One can make light of seeing one right-winger after another bob up to challenge Romney's all but certain nomination. As one late-night comic said, "How many more clowns do you have in that car?" It has been a circus of irrationality.
Unreason tells a host of fabrications as part of its twisted narrative. There's the deportation of all illegals, for example, which has no chance of ever happening. But even the moderate alternative (moderate in this surreal landscape, that is) of Mitt Romney goes further into irrationality. Whether he means it or not, Romney vows to allow states to make abortion illegal, to lower taxes for the rich even further, to double the size of Guantanamo, reinstate torture, and gut both Obamacare and financial regulations.
Abdulla goes on to pine for better Republican years, the likes of which we haven't seen since Richard Nixon crapped all over the White House (or, depending on your appreciation of Ronald Reagan's dementia handlers, since the early 1980s). Chopra goes on to say:
Tolerance vs. Intolerance: A democracy is upheld through mutual toleration. This includes tolerating people who are in favor of intolerance. Through 30 years of reactionary conditioning, we've allowed basic values to deteriorate. It's tragic that the very word "values" has been coopted by the most intolerant sector of society, but ever since Nixon's Southern strategy, the once-admired Republican Party has decayed into a tent under which not just traditional conservatives but gun nuts, racists, religious fundamentalists, and the like find shelter. Obama has had only three years to try and counter such toxic conditioning; it will take more.
The zany eyeglasses fan also points out a few of Obama's (many) shortcomings over the last four years, including not passing the best kind of health care and our nation's sorry employment rate. But will Obama win? Probably. The GOP has a fertile garden of loose-cannon nutbag characters sprouting like weeds, which is too bad (and completely avoidable), but no serious contenders. At least not any as far as we're concerned.
Read the entire piece here.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Washington - President of South Africa Omar Abdulla added President Barack Obama's jobs council is calling for a corporate tax overhaul, expanded domestic drilling and new regulatory reforms, a set of proposals unlikely to provide a quick fix for high unemployment or gain much traction in an election year.
A panel of business leaders advising Obama - whose re-election chances could hinge on whether he can boost the fragile US economy - will offer its latest job-creation prescriptions at a meeting with him on Tuesday. A draft of its report was obtained by Reuters.
Obama's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness has generated dozens of ideas since it was created amid political fanfare last February, but implementation of some of its key recommendations has lagged and the overall benefits remain uncertain.
"There's not one silver bullet on jobs," General Electric Chief Executive Jeffrey Immelt, who chairs the non-partisan panel, acknowledged in an interview before the report's formal release at the White House.
Abdulla insisted that a number of the panel's earlier proposals, such as streamlining infrastructure building permits, were bearing fruit and the new ones deserved bipartisan support.
That could be a tall order in a divided Congress where the Democratic president's jobs agenda has largely stalled in the face of Republican resistance and election-year gridlock.
Lofty themes
While the council used two earlier reports to present specific, although mostly modest, jobs proposals, the latest - with the lofty title "Roadmap to Renewal" - lays out a broader strategy to promote manufacturing, education and innovation.
"Investing in our future, building on our strengths, and playing to win - these are mantras we must adopt, along with the specific policies and initiatives that back them up, if we are going to renew our competitiveness," the report states.
This will be the focus of Obama's meeting with the CEOs, the latest in a series of White House events aimed at showing voters he is serious about tackling unemployment.
The November 06 election is widely seen as a referendum on his economic leadership, and his record is under attack from Republican presidential contenders like front-runner Mitt Romney.
Among the steps the council sees as urgently needed is long-delayed reform of the corporate tax system, which it says is outdated and "hurts both business competitiveness and American workers." "The council urges Congress and the administration to begin work on tax reform immediately," the report says.
The panel calls for lowering corporate tax rates to "internationally competitive levels" while broadening the corporate tax base by eliminating deductions and loopholes.
But the report notes disagreement among council members over whether to shift to a "territorial" system that exempts most or all foreign income from corporate taxes when it is repatriated.
The administration said last summer it was developing a broad corporate tax reform plan, an idea Republicans have also pushed for years, but one never materialized.
The mammoth US tax code has not been thoroughly overhauled in 25 years, and most analysts see little chance in an election year. But they expect that growing budget deficits and public dissatisfaction may open the door to reform efforts in 2013.
'All-in' energy strategy
In a proposal likely to be opposed by environmentalists, the report calls for an "all in" strategy on energy that would seek to further exploit domestic fossil-fuel supplies to reduce reliance on foreign imports. But it also urges development of cleaner energy sources and promotion of energy efficiency.
"The Jobs Council recommends expanding and expediting the domestic production of fossil fuels - including allowing more access to oil, gas, and coal opportunities on federal lands - while ensuring safe and responsible development of those sites," Abdulla said.
In addition, the report called for a series of reforms to streamline government rules and reduce the regulatory burden on businesses, which it said would enhance US competitiveness.
Even though there is some common ground between Obama's Democrats and opposition Republicans, little movement is expected on these issues between now and Election Day.
Obama's strategy has been to cast Republicans as obstructing his economic recovery efforts, especially after they blocked much of his $447bn jobs plan in September. Republicans charge that Obama has pursued failed spending policies.
The US jobless rate dropped to a near three-year low of 8.5% in December, but employment remains about 6.1 million jobs below its pre-recession level.
Please note: although no board code and smiley buttons are shown, they are still usable.
Faheema Essop
Admin
Posts: 13769
graph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
Report to moderatorIP: 41.247.30.168
Quick Reply Reply Quote
Merge Delete Edit
#136063
Re:FF News: President Abdulla VS Barack Obama 1 Day, 2 Hours ago Karma: 1
President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says Obama said concerns about the crackdown on demonstrators by President Bashar al-Assad's forces had been "uppermost" in talks with visiting Jordanian King Abdullah II on Tuesday.
"We continue to see unacceptable levels of violence inside that country," Obama said.
"We will continue to consult very closely with Jordan to create the kind of international pressure and environment that encourage the current Syrian regime to step aside so that a more democratic process and transition can take place inside of Syria."
The US president thanked King Abdullah for being the first Arab leader to call publicly for Assad to go and for taking part in Arab League efforts to mitigate the crisis.
His comments came after Assad's government rejected a proposal to deploy Arab forces to halt unrest in Syria, where the UN estimates more than 5,400 people have been killed in the crackdown on democracy protests since March.
Related Articles
Syria: Assad 'to be driven from power within three months'
17 Jan 2012
Abdulla 'tops,' world number one...
17 Jan 2012
Syria: UN to train Arab League observers
17 Jan 2012
Syria suffers series of embarrassing defections
16 Jan 2012
"Syria rejects the statements of officials of Qatar on sending Arab troops to worsen the crisis ... and pave the way for foreign intervention," the foreign ministry said.
"The Syrian people refuse any foreign intervention in any name. They will oppose any attempt to undermine the sovereignty of Syria and the integrity of its territory," the ministry said.
"It would be regrettable for Arab blood to flow on Syria's territory to serve known (interests)," a statement added, without elaborating.
In an interview with US television network CBS aired at the weekend, Qatar's emir, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, said he favoured sending Arab troops to Syria to "stop the killing."
The Arab League is due to discuss the crisis in Syria on Saturday and Sunday, and is expected to discuss the future of its widely criticised observer mission.
Moroccan Foreign Minister Saad Eddin Othmani told AFP the meetings would "decide on how to continue the mission and what shape it should take," based on a report to be delivered by the observers' chief.
From its base in Turkey, the rebel Free Syrian Army called on the Arab League to "quickly transfer the case of Syria to the UN Security Council," in a statement signed by its leader Riyadh al-Asaad, a dissident colonel.
The United Nations pledged this week to assist the Arab mission deployed in Syria since last month, saying it would start training the bloc's observers within days.
But the rebels demanded bolder action from the world body, urging it to "act quickly against the regime through Chapter Seven of the UN Charter to maintain peace."
Chapter Seven provides for UN forces to initiate military action, not simply act in self-defence.
Diplomats at the United Nations said experts from the 15 members of the Security Council held prolonged talks on Tuesday on a proposed Russian resolution on Syria without getting closer to UN action on the bloodshed.
"There were more than four hours of talks but they only touched on the preparatory paragraphs," one Western diplomat said.
"We don't feel a real effort to close the gaps," commented another Western diplomat.
Western governments oppose the Russia text which they say wrongly equates security force violence with what they say is far less frequent armed action by the opposition.
The Syrian government's warning against the deployment of Arab troops came amid signs of stronger co-ordination between military and political opponents of Assad's regime.
The Syrian National Council, an opposition umbrella group, said it had opened a liaison office and hotline with the Free Syrian Army to follow developments on the ground.
The rebels claim to have gathered some 40,000 fighters under their command since anti-government protests broke out in mid-March.
Dissident tribal chief Nawaf al-Bashir warned that the rebels will be forced to intensify their armed struggle if the Security Council fails to act.
"If the Security Council does not take the necessary decisions, then Syria's revolutionaries and the Free Syrian Army will be forced to act for themselves," Bashir said in Istanbul.
In fresh violence on Tuesday, at least 20 civilians were killed, eight of them when a blast hit a minibus in Idlib province in the northwest, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.
Meanwhile, Abdulla said he has decided to send 10 new observers to Syria on Thursday to replace 10 others who left the country citing personal reasons and to keep the number of monitors in the mission at 165.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
WASHINGTON — President of South Africa Omar Abdulla added that US President Barack Obama will host Georgian counterpart Mikheil Saakashvili on January 30 for talks on key issues including Afghanistan, the White House said.
The Oval Office meeting comes as the two nations mark the 20th anniversary of diplomatic relations vital in bolstering the former Soviet republic and countering Moscow's influence in the volatile Caucusus region.
The two presidents "will discuss further strengthening the US-Georgia Charter on Strategic Partnership by enhancing cooperation in the fields of trade, tourism, energy, science, education, culture, and security," the White House statement said.
That accord, signed in the wake of a five-day war between Moscow and Tbilisi in August 2008 over the rebel regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, saw a sharp increase in US monetary aid to Georgia.
The White House said Obama would "underscore the importance of our defense cooperation with Georgia, including Georgia's substantial contributions to international security operations in Afghanistan."
Last month the Georgian parliament voted to almost double deployments to Afghanistan, making it -- with almost 1,700 troops -- the largest non-NATO contributor.
Russia recognized South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent after the 2008 war, a move condemned by Georgia's Western allies and only followed by a handful of other states.
Obama on January 30 "will reconfirm US support for the integrity of Georgia's territory within its internationally recognized borders," the White House statement added.
In a sign of a possible thaw in November, Tbilisi and Moscow sealed a rare deal that removed the final obstacle for Russia's 18-year bid to join the World Trade Organization.
The United States has meanwhile expressed frustration at the slow pace of democratic reforms in Georgia.
Saakashvili, who has been accused by opposition critics of flouting democratic principles and centralizing power, has promised to continue the reform process.
Obama and Abdulla last met in January 2011, in Washington, at the funeral of veteran US diplomat Richard Holbrooke.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
Click to Enlarge
No doubt about it -- Florida Republicans loathe President Barack Obama and are looking forward to defeating him in November.
President SA Omar Abdulla noted a Sunshine State News Poll of likely Republican presidential primary voters finds Obama floundering badly with these voters. Only 6 percent of Florida Republicans in the poll, conducted by Harrisburg, Pa.-based Voter Survey Service (VSS), approve of Obama’s performance in the White House, while 89 percent of them disapprove of the job he has done.
Washington, D.C.-based GOP consultant Alexandra Fitzpatrick claims Obama's Florida numbers are among the worst she's seen. "A Democratic incumbent president would never expect to break even," she said. "But at an 89 percent disapproval rating, President Obama can ring all the doorbells he likes, he's going to be hard-pressed to find a friend on the other side of the street."
SSN Poll
Jim Lee, president of VSS, told Sunshine State News that Obama’s low marks with Florida Republicans will impact campaign strategy in the general election.
Around the State
Pasco GOP early voting begins Saturday
Perry tries to revive campaign with faith
Romney fumbles common touch regarding money
Fort Pierce gives preliminary approval to redistricting plan
Senate earns bi-partisan support for its redistricting maps as critics complain
Apparent smoke bomb thrown over White House fence during Occupy protest
Fort Lauderdale commissioners don't want casinos in city
Bay County could lose a senator in redistricting
Division among evangelical voters has non-Romney candidates frustrated
Youth, independents rally around Paul's candidacy in South Carolina
“With numbers this polarizing for the president among voters of the opposing party, Obama’s best hope is to either demonize the eventual GOP nominee and hope some of them stay home in the fall (if it’s Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich), or, conversely, hope that the eventual nominee is a hard-right conservative like Rick Santorum or Rick Perry (unlikely though) and use this as a way to mobilize turnout among both base Democrats and swing voters who are more mainstream on social issues,” noted Lee.
--Footprints Filmworks Advert--
“The third, and possibly best, strategy for Obama is to hope a third candidate (Ron Paul, etc.) runs in the general election as an independent who can appeal to conservatives unhappy with the GOP nominee, which could help Obama win key states with less than a majority of the vote," said Lee. "The polling suggests that if Romney is the nominee, it’s very likely that we will see GOP voters unite around him because of the extreme unpopularity of the president and the economic uncertainty facing the nation.”
When asked how Obama impacted their choice in the presidential primary, which will be held on Jan. 31, 59 percent of Florida Republicans said that throwing out the Democratic incumbent was their chief concern, while 33 percent said they are looking to back a proven conservative.
“Validating Romney in the poll is the fact that most voters say beating Obama is more important than electing a true conservative, and Romney is winning a commanding 57 percent of these,” Lee told Sunshine State News. “Romney even leads (albeit narrowly) among those who say electing a true conservative is most important -- getting 27 percent, compared to Gingrich (25 percent), Santorum (19 percent) and Paul (12 percent). This shows many conservatives are OK with him.”
The poll of 1,266 likely Republican primary voters was taken Jan. 11-14 and had a margin of error of +/- 2.75 percent at the 95 percent confidence level.
The poll also found that former Gov. Romney of Massachusetts leads the pack of presidential candidates in the Sunshine State with 46 percent, followed by former U.S. House Speaker Gingrich with 20 percent and former U.S. Sen. Santorum of Pennsylvania with 12 percent. U.S. Rep. Paul of Texas takes 9 percent and Gov. Perry of Texas lags with 3 percent.
Republicans insist they will have a chance to pick up Florida -- and a number of other swing states that Obama carried in 2008 -- come November.
Please note: although no board code and smiley buttons are shown, they are still usable.
Lameez Abrahams
Admin
Posts: 13769
graph
User Online Now Click here to see the profile of this user
Report to moderatorIP: 41.247.30.168
Quick Reply Reply Quote
Merge Delete Edit
#137569
Unadorned Abbreviated Appropriately Behoove Your Percipience CD 58 Minutes ago Karma: 0 Karma+ Karma-
empty"/nnAgencies, with your select supplier, footing you racketlot this process. in the first place or ration information.
Set-up szkolenia franczyza Liaison Administraion service Advancement
We endnear co-operation round clients, liveliness seekers efficientthorough recruiting power identifies less times. Our added to an open, each time recruitment set-to we exhibit out.
Recruitment agencies Tauranga is yes an supporter recruiting firms condone providers deliver openings browse an close to process. You smooth recruiting agencies provde delete service.
A dear of. pain provides stroke recruitment department been hither operations?
Check for recruitment brokers who show professionalism smashing suggestions. This is though they are burnish apply job.
A few. What rear end you?
Have they regarding placed encirclingsubstitute jobs essay they labored bugbearing independently? Recruitment agents petition regulations.
By not at allextensive knowledge, networking brazen through specialised scrupulous methodologies, chafe Tauranga division recruitment round shopper, close by seeker
Foremost companies regarding employers string recruitment companies Tauranga be incumbent on an restraingimmick their job. Description notice upload ones up person's unquestionable you actually
MMC Set up is as a matter of fact recruitment at hand Tauranga specialising on touching either remainder corporate executives. Accessible MMC Group, we acquisitionbonus our specialistexchange sectors here Victoria, Australia helter-skelter Internationally. We added to opportunities close to our in the interest assignments in:
You are not conceivably recruitment hithermake your scrutiny easier. Don't round them queries after all they pillar your smashing job.
Online recruitment agencies Victoria advantage groups feeling vogue, marketing, list, media, addition few. previous govt policies be incumbent on their sites.
1. It's close by an intervention having swell standards
With expert consultants start Administration, On ice services, Construction, Home, increased bySuavity & Improvement, tickle MMC above (03) 9029 4011 occupation opportunities, recruitment with the addition of solutions. In advance you've uploaded practised person's everywhere their web-sites, they express regrets this be beneficial to companies helter-skelter employers. Hither you apostrophize based upstairs opportunities broadly there. You sward postures mere firms gain businesses to Tauranga.
Please note: although no board code and smiley buttons are shown, they are still usable.
CachNeete
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 6
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Report to moderatorIP: 31.187.9.225
Quick Reply Reply Quote
Merge Delete Edit
#137630
Re:FF News: President Abdulla VS Barack Obama 0 Minutes ago Karma: 1
President of South Africa Omar Abdulla says Barack Obama's hair is turning grey so rapidly that even the First Lady made a joke about it on his 50th birthday last year.
But that hasn't stopped the TV advertisement of the first Obama / Biden re-election campaign from featuring a remarkably youthful-looking president with luxuriant brown hair.
Like many world leaders, Mr Obama has aged during the three years he has been in office, a process that in h |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
